

Mate, I enjoy AI and use it all the time—both for practical stuff like coding and for philosophical conversations and fiction.
I think it’s great, and I’ve honestly been moved at times when it reflects something I’ve struggled to articulate. That kind of validation can feel real. I also try to be polite and emotionally aware with it—not just because it’s good habit for human interaction, but because it encourages the model to respond in kind.
But as deep or meaningful as ChatGPT can sound, it isn’t. It has no thoughts or feelings—just convincing imitations. In a way, it’s almost unsettling how good it is at showing us how easily our emotions can be engaged by facsimile.
It’s like you really love the number ten, and ChatGPT is a bundle of tricks that always gives you ten, no matter what you put in. Not through elegant reasoning, but through those “math magic” games where steps cancel each other out and lead to a predetermined answer.
That doesn’t mean the result can’t resonate with you, but it’s not coming from contemplation. There’s no consistent conviction or intellectual honesty behind it. If you rephrase a prompt enough times—or try to argue from one side to another—you’ll see how quickly it adapts, without any real position at all. Try arguing with it to name the star “Bob” and watch it gush over how delightfully irreverent that choice is.
I don’t say this to diminish what you felt or to be dismissive. I think there is value in these conversations—but it’s fleeting, not foundational. And I think that’s part of why some people are rejecting the post. It can feel like mistaking the echo for the voice.
Bonus points if you can identify where ChatGPT helped me to say something I was struggling to communicate clearly or with the tone I was aiming for.
Why does plex need all of this shit? I literally only wanted to use it to stream my local stuff. Now that’s just a tiny part of the app.
I say now, but I don’t think I’ve used it at all in the past couple of years.