This easily results in humans having to pay licensing fees just to look at art, because humans also use past context
What is creativity? It’s nothing but what you have learned plus neural noise. If we try this Luddite dogmatic nonsense we’d have to kill human art as well, fucking THINK MARK, THINK!
That shit was INCREDIBLY dumb
It comes from the old records industry.
Also, guys, let me rush to my university to tell them they’re extremely racist to enroll me in a “Master’s” program.in fucking Iran.
Isn’t this only for Oracle’s JDK?
Just use an open source fucking solution
If there is ONE project that needs a rewrite in modern C++ OR Rust (or some other ‘safe’ language) it’s FUCKING CUPS
Please, Rust fanatics, do ONE good instead of rewriting GPL programs into a corpo-rat license
C++ when it was new was exactly like this. Rust still hasn’t had 30 years of legacy, all these Rust prophets will shit on it’s name in 15 years when they have to maintain huge codebases with it
Besides, C++ is very likely to adopt memory safety
So, you could say everyone is copying Elon Musk
Try programming in Dart. Dart’s static analyser and package manager will go nuts 0.0001 seconds before the fucking packages load
A cheap shit MSI Interceptor mouse that I used for 10 fucking years and bought for chum change could remember it’s settings because it had persistent memory on device
And Logitech is still scamming the fuck out of people
That’s based on a harmless Unix game that you can install forks of which on modern day Linux as well, by the way
This is actually more stupid because it’s literally Intel’s fault
Their own fucking XeSS crashes on their own fucking GPUs under Linux so you have to fake the GPU and beg for it to not actually recognize it’s Intel.
Seriously. Try publishing anything not written in Rust nowadays and you WILL get multiple “bUt baut mUh rUsT??? 1?1!! 11!1!” Comments.
Humans train on past art. Fundamentally speaking there is no new thing created without millions of predecessor context.
Materialistic analysis demands that nothing exists without context, thus your point is moot.