• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 days ago

    Not lighter, it has much less air resistance because of aerodynamic design.

    The human torso on a regular bicycle is basically a wall. If you’ve ever ridden a bicycle on a windy day, you should know the agony. It’s like continuously riding up a slope.

    • falseWhite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      You’re talking about efficiency, but in the chart the velomobile is marked as lighter than a bicycle. Why?

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        It’s denoted as being only slightly lighter, which I guess might be doable if you’re optimal about the construction. It is indeed a bit weird though, on average a bicycle should be possible to build lighter than a velomobile

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        Yeah, I didn’t think of the graph when responding.

        Though I believe it’s wrong.

        How is a bicycle supposed to weigh 100 kg with a rider? The average bike is certainly less than 20 kg so the rider would have to weigh 80 kg or more - which seems like a lot for the average human. I mean, it’s overweight even for the average man.

        According to the German Wikipedia page, velomobiles weigh between 20 to 40 kg. And the former seems to be only achievable with a full carbon fiber build. That’s definitely more than your average bicycle.