• not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, clearly. This is my point. If they had made it about saving money for the customer then it would be acceptable. They absolutely could have. But they didn’t, so fuck them.

      • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I get where you’re coming from, and you’re probably right in this instance, but I disagree with your absolutist “never” stance (insert/ignore star wars meme per preference.)

        There are plenty of free ad-supported services out there, a classic example being Gmail. If the user was not getting anything of value from this “free” service they would not use it. So they ARE getting something for free because of the ads. The fact that El Goog is selling their data for profit, making the user the actual product and the advertisers the customers, is a separate matter, and I suspect, is what you’re leaning in to.