I stumbled across this link in the comment of another post, and thought it was super promising!

Someone mentioned something about in the US, this would be illegal due to DRM laws - not sure about the specifics of this, but regardless an open source printer seems like something we’ve needed for ages, as printers are something that always seem like way more of a headache then they need to be. It seems like such a simple technology that has existed for quite some time, but they are always such a pain to deal with. (Maybe it’s just my bad luck with printers?)

  • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The only thing we are missing is a scanner. Now if only we had a FOSH-Scanner (FOSH = Free & Open-Source Hardware)

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    there is so. much. shit. already about, we don’t need another one, like this thing and fairphone and framework and whatever. we’re drowning in already produced things, nerfed by their manufacturers into bricks that can and should be repurposed by opensource solutions.

    but that’s not where you can make money, so they’re instead latching onto trends, like “open” and “repairable”, both of which are nothingburgers.

    a infinitely small percentile of users actually need the newest & best, the rest of us are fine with decade+ old hardware that can serve us a decade more.

    • onoira [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      … actually one does need later hardware for a phone that will work on 5G networks.

      if i’m understanding you right, you’re saying we should be reusing old, functional hardware instead of producing brand-new shit (which just turns old stuff into ewaste). i agree. if countries repealed anticircumvention, i imagine there would be an industry for upcycling electronics.

    • Cease@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      not exactly sure what your point is here? Having an open source repairable printer is great

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        having ANOTHER printer getting manufactured and sold when all the printers we’re ever gonna need are already produced and out there in the world is a thing that’s sorely not needed.

        • Cease@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          I don’t really think that the world is free from ever needing a new printer, what kind of take is that? This project promises 3d buildable components that run on a pi? Exactly how does that contribute to global e-waste if that’s your point? PLA plastic biodegrades, pis can be re-used for other stuff, and inkjet cartridges can be refilled. What possible issue could you find with a project that’s open to the public and you can construct yourself??

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    pretty stupid that we need shit like this in the first place, but thank foss this exists.

  • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    >inkjet

    LED printers have been around for fucking ever, and the average person doesn’t need the graphic fidelity that only an overpriced pigment soup, which goes bad in a month, can supply.

    Oh, and literally every part of a toner-based printer is easier to replace/repair… so why would a printer designed around repairability and upgradability use ink???

    Edit’ And I almost forgot: toner is cheaper per page than ink! Whyyy???

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      I had a brother laser printer with a pre-heating roll that went bad. Sourcing a replacement for that was pretty annoying. But I get your point.

    • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      because it makes it way more easy to build such a “open source” printer, the print head with all its mems chips structures is already on the ink cardrige, meaning hardware wise this thing is just a 2 stepper motors, one for x and y axis.

      laser/led printers would be in fact the superior printer, but it would also be way more complex hardware wise.

      • NathanUp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This. Based on my (elementary) understanding of laser printers, you have to have a laser zap a transfer belt to charge it so that it will elecromagnetically attract the toner, then precisely lay down a fine layer of toner onto the belt, then lay the microplastics + iron filings from the belt onto the page, repeat this four times, then roll the page through a tiny oven to bake on the thin, shiny layer of plastic. It’s very complicated, and have you seen the price of new fuser units or transfer belts?

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      They’re taking an HP printer head and customizing only the motors and controls. This is a lot easier but also a lot more reliant on HP

    • Redkey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Thanks to the proliferation of portable devices, a lot of people no longer need a printer for “regular” printing at all in 2026, and some of the more interesting printing substrates either don’t accept toner well or won’t survive the heat of a laser printer’s toner setting stage.

      Also, while the technology is theoretically simpler, it may be harder for an individual to source or make the physical components like rotating drums and high-res LED arrays.

        • SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Not only that; I’ve read that ink-jet printers need regular use to keep blockages from forming. Anecdotally, our printer seems to need printer head cleaning whenever I actually use it.

          By the way, your comment has a formatting issue.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      toner is cheaper per page than ink! Whyyy???

      I think a toner re-fill is a little harder to get/make/do.

      • UnfinishedProjects@piefed.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think it might largely depends on your 1. Career/job/ or even hobby requirements 2. Where you live (government agencies requiring paper documents, signatures, etc)

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago
        1. I like a printed copy of recipes (I put them in page liners so they’re reusable and cleanable). Books on the counter suck.
        2. kids have projects to do.
        3. not everyone does e signatures so you have to print it sign it then scan it.

        There’s more. I’m just bored.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If printers didn’t suck I may consider using them by choice. Does also depend on cost per page, which I suppose varies by what you print.

      • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I print recipes (don’t want to worry about spilling on devices), worksheets for my daughter, and gov’t/bank documents that require physical signatures. Occasionally I’ll make a print and play game as well.

        I don’t like the obsolescence cycle of tablets.

  • barryamelton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    CC BY-NC-SA

    Not open printer. Not open source. You will only be able to get replacements from them, worse than some other printer companies…

  • David_Eight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve been seeing this thing for months and there’s been no updates. Is there any word on release date/price, I really how this isn’t vaporware.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Sounds like it comes with a refillable cartridge, but you can also use off the shelf HP cartridges.

      And since there’s no DRM, 3rd party cartridges will work too.