X is Musk, which is TL;DR quite different

it doesn’t censor news with class consciousness like Meta does

Maybe? But they do manually tell the algorithm to heavily favor the elite’s videos with their “heating” tool.

Don’t they do the same things? In fact TikTok spies more stuff, but they just don’t sell it to private entities as much.

“I would rather stare at a language I can’t understand than to ever use a social media [platform] that Mark Zuckerberg owns,” said one user in a video posted to Xiaohongshu on Sunday.

then why tf did you use tiktok

I’m fairly excited about Ladybird because it’s already gotten 423 on html5test vs Firefox 128’s 544. I do agree that they’re currently pretty much alpha quality, though.

most defunct / unmaintained and the three: blink, gecko and webkit being the only ones actively developed and maintained today (I am aware of Goanna, but some articles online say it isn’t being developed anymore – I could be wrong).

The fourth most developed browser engine is Ladybird, spun off from the SerenityOS project. It’s very active. And then you have Mozilla’s Servo… kinda. And then Goanna is still maintained, but not too active.

The modern depiction of Santa is based on Coca-Cola.

I think it took the normal amount of time…

Framework with Fedora, whom they’ve partnered with basically since launch

fair, but i understand the choice as that’s a lot more work to do along with having to adopt some sort of arbitrary inclusion standard

Aren’t a slow update schedule and a closer look to home better for newbies?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLnet

…is that all? that it uses XOrg?

https://arewewaylandyet.com/

that’s called competition

It’s quite independent from Wikidata. It’s an alpha-stage programming functions repository.

Somehow, it feels horrifying to use something that high-level for the backend, especially when MediaWiki has so much PHP and the WMF has so many PHP programmers. Maybe my adolescent arse is getting old…

Wikifunctions finally exposed running functions via API in March, though yeah, it’s still a long, long way from being integrated in wikis, not to mention the arcane parameter that is passing a JSON via URL. (and hopefully you meant Wikifunctions and not Wikidata lol)

“No longer open source” is factually true. However, it gives the impression that they did something much more drastic. It would be much better to just get to the point with something like “draw.io forbids competitors for Atlassian integration from using their code”.

TL;DR: Competitors in integrating with Atlassian are not allowed to incorporate code after the change because they used it in free add-ons, which caused the official integration (a paid add-on that is the sole source of funding) to be labeled a scam by a review in late August.

Plus, the thing was never really open source anyway:

draw.io is also closed to contributions, as it’s not open source. We follow a development process compliant with our SOC 2 Type II process. We do not have a mechanism where we can accept contributions from non-staff members.

Apache is a permissive license, plus:

draw.io is also closed to contributions, as it’s not open source. We follow a development process compliant with our SOC 2 Type II process. We do not have a mechanism where we can accept contributions from non-staff members.

This was added wayyyy before. OP is making this much more of a deal than it actually is.

Yeah, my point being Guilded was always proprietary and never hostable.