Just because your puny human brain can’t comprehend the reason doesn’t mean they didn’t have one.

one AI that always manages to draw in chess is Stable diffusion and dalle…

/j

maybe a distant future technology could compute that, Clarktech style

bes way to learn is by doing what you’re not supposed to

yhea, but engines still act as if it is an unsolved game.

while in theory, given that the number of moves is limited, in theory one colour would always win.

not to get epistemological,

but I hate that technically there’s only a limited number of moves in chess, and therefore the best move is there, maybe there’s a strategic where white will always win, but we’ll never know because the number of variations likely is larger than atoms in the universe.

hey, there is an inherent fun in maing games/programs using things that were never meant to.

once i did a CPU/RAM emulator using excel, so you could see every bit.

it was fun to make loops, and programs

wait, we will lose xEyes?

rehabilitation is better

however, we do have to do something with those billionaires and oligarchs

Punch cards>>>Sed>>>>Vi>>>>Kate>>>Vi$ual$tudio

Bash one liners are one is the most fun things in programming.

ouch, sorry about that.

that sucks

I still wonder why.

unless it’s for something that you want to work as an importable module and a standalone tool, then why do you need that?

you can, no one stopping you

aren’t most of not all conventions hacky anyways?

compared with other languages at the time, the ease of access and readability makes it worth it. plus, the heavy duty stuff is usually handled by more optimised code line numpy or sklearn…

R still gives me chills, never hated a language until I had to use R in my PhD.

Still furious when half packages need different versions of the same thing making them incompatible.

Please, direct your hatred for R here:

yhea, sorry.

oh, so it’s it’s own language too.

I only use it to access WSL (don’t judge me)