Lemmy is tech-minded, there are safe spaces for trans people. You can basically do the math.

I’ve got backups. Haven’t updated or looked at my server in months. If I’m ever compromised by missing security updates, I just load a backup and regenerate all keys.

I don’t put any critical data on public facing servers.

Until you run into some kind of problem :D

The close message should just say exactly this. If it’s one click to reopen, then the click is the response to your suggested notification.

Well the reason to auto-close is that this is not an entirely unlikely resolution. When I inherited a project with a bunch of issues and started going through the backlog, around 50% of tickets were duplicates, already solved, unreproducible, etc etc

When you’ve only got limited time, having less of those issues to analyze and then close anyway is a very valid reason. It leaves more time for fixing real issues. Of course it comes at the cost of ignoring perfectly valid issues as well, that’s why this is obviously never an optimal policy to implement, and should only be done in desperate situations.

That’s why the “easy way to reopen” is so important. Your concern is theoretically valid, but if tickets are usually ignored for years, then it really is a desperate situation for the project whichever way you handle it. You can decide between an endlessly growing list of issues that likely aren’t valid anymore, or pissing some users off.

I don’t really see why it would be harder to find an existing or similar bug. You should be looking (or rather you should be automatically notified) before/during creating a new ticket for existing tickets describing the problem. If a closed ticket describes the exact problem, you should be finding that too, and then should just be able to use the easy way of reopening if necessary. You should also be able to find the workaround in there if someone posted it.

It’s definitely not a beautiful solution, but if you implement something like this, the project is already in a desperate state, there’s not too much good choices there anymore.

I… know… that’s why I explicitly mentioned this already xD

I don’t think so. It should have an easy way of reopening - if it has, and you’re flooded with tickets on an open source project that you can’t possibly handle all, then it’s a good way to prioritize. Of course it doesn’t have an easy way to reopen here, which sucks, it’s some kind of locking instead of just closing it with a possibility to reopen.

Old tickets have a non-zero chance of the reporter being the only one to run into it because of a weird setup/usecase (and then abandoning the project), it being fixed by other work, or probably a bunch of other reasons it could be obsolete.

If no one cares enough to reopen it once every 6 months, then it’s probably fine to ignore it indefinitely.

I literally have a rpi4 and just put libreELEC on it

int toIncrement = ...;
int result;
do {
  result = randomInt();
} while (result != (toIncrement + 1));
print(result);

It’s absolutely not a skill worth having. If you ever run into issues and need the CLI, you can always get your knowledge right in that moment. If you already can do everything with your GUI and get the same results, getting the knowledge to do it some other way is just wasted time and duplicate work.

Maybe because the whole “blue light in displays” has no real effect on our sleep

One thing that people didn’t mention yet: this is the behavior that made him (stay) a billionaire. You don’t get to be one by being nice and non-exploitative.

Of course, the assumption was that the senior was actually competent and non-malicious, which may of course be false.

The question is, was nothing done because they’re incompetent or because they don’t care about the job and were able to do nothing with a “good” excuse

-f "[height=1080]"

ich sollte auf keinen Fall so beantworten

Da ist halt genau das Problem. Jeder hält den Mund wegen X. Logisch ändert sich so nichts.

Ich fühle mit dir, so ist es nicht, aber wenn kein Pfleger so mit sich umspringen lassen würde, würde es auch nicht passieren, denn Pfleger werden gebraucht. Wenn jeder die Klappe hält bleibt es halt so.

Ich mein, dafür sind eigentlich Gewerkschaften und Streiks. Aber die meisten im Gesundheitswesen würden das nicht machen, weil die Patienten dann Probleme kriegen. Aber genau das nutzen Arbeitgeber halt aus.

Der einzige Weg ist, sich zusammenzuschließen, zu streiken, und als Forderung die Arbeitsbedingungen verbessern. Ist kurzfristig für Patienten negativ, aber langfristig würde es besser. Wenn Arbeitgeber halt wissen, dass niemals gestreikt werden wird, können die Arbeitsbedingungen immer schlechter werden, und das werden sie ja anscheinend auch.

Alternativ kannst du dich natürlich persönlich immer weigern, etwas zu tun, was du nicht tun möchtest. Wird halt wahrscheinlich auf Kündigung rauslaufen, wenn andere das nicht mitmachen.

I’m sorry, but distinguishing between different concepts is forbidden here. You go straight to jail.

Is it only ironic to me that it’s hosted on GitHub? :D