This is the inverse of data compression.

Hyperlink which went to a different article. Do you not understand how the Internet works? Don’t act like you weren’t wrong when you failed to clarify properly. That’s not on me

So…not in the article, but in a completely different linked article. Got it

The word laser does not appear once in this article.

Where’s it say they used a laser to transfer the information? This sounded like quantum entanglement was being demonstrated here

Reddit went public a year ago…

You can just block that instance

Is this accessible outside your own home network, or is it restricted to local?

This is funny because you’re the one confusing LLM as the only option when it comes to AI.

A lot of things actually. A ton of material science breakthroughs lately. Science in general. I’ve read about recent astronomical discoveries, too.

It’s probably that people familiar with the technicals of AI don’t automatically assume it’s LLMs being talked about. There’s several other types being out to very good use, especially in the sciences right now.

Even LLMs have their place as interpretors for those other types. Having natural language interpretation that is fairly accurate the vast majority of the time is a powerful tool with a lot of applications. Near Real time translation or closed captioning is great for accessibility.

Anyone who has to vocalize that they’re an alpha, isn’t. Your brother is a loser.

That’s what staging is for…

Ah yes, AGI… Automation Generating Income

deleted by creator

This is the dumb kind of “best do nothing, because both no is perfect” approach to making sure no disincentives are ever taken because someone somewhere else might also try to do the illegal thing that they’ll lose access to the moment they’re caught…

I never suggested destroying the technology that is “AI”. I’m not uncomfortable about AI, I’ve even considered pivoting my career in that direction.

I suggested destroying the particular implementation that was trained on the illegitimate data. If someone can recreate it using legitimate data, GREAT. That’s what we want to happen. The tool isn’t the problem. It’s the method they’re using to train them.

Please don’t make up random ass narratives I never even hunted at, and then argue against them.

That’s stupid. The damage is still done to the owner of that data used illegally. Make them destroy it.

But when you levy such miniscule fines that are less than they stand to make from it, it’s just a cost of business. Fines can work if they were appropriate to the value derived.

What dumbass is letting AI post articles without human oversight? That’s like rule one of what not to do.

Corporate media is going to protect their advertisers by shotgunning bullshit articles trying to change the narrative