We got to do something simular in uni. We modeled the CPU in VHDL and had to set up our own language, then we were to program a game for it. One of the most fun and interesting courses we got to do!
We got to do something simular in uni. We modeled the CPU in VHDL and had to set up our own language, then we were to program a game for it. One of the most fun and interesting courses we got to do!
This graph only mentions “one fewer child” though, which implies you can still have kids. But having one fewer kid might influence your other kid/s to have even more grandchildren, so having descendants in this graph makes no real sense, since it could vary from far less climate savings per year, to infinitely more climate savings. It could fluctuate way too much for it to be actually relevant in this graph.
It feels a bit misleading to use cummulative for all descendants for the annual axis, especially since eventual grandchildren aren’t your choice.
That’s easy to remember!