I think this kind of research and discourse about it is important from an ethical and social reckoning standpoint, but I don’t think it is economically worthwhile to engage in a neverending arms race between AI censorship and the boundless determination of trolls.

So my hypothesis is that we are going to see governments roll out legislation that just recognizes defeat and fully deregulates AI generated content online rather than spending the time/money/energy trying to hold corporations or individuals accountable for what LLMs say.

Perhaps we will see regulations around what AI agents do insofar as executing code or submitting transactional requests, but I really doubt there are going to be many enforced limitations on what LLMs say in the near future.

It will probably be the same policies that finally put the copyright concerns over their enormously controversial training data to rest, ultimately killing any prospect of copyright holders to sue for damages over stolen art/code/etc.

🙋‍♂️

deleted by creator

Yeah, not a bad answer! I’d assume someone is on the trolley too, but that’s just an assumption and, hey, maybe they would survive the wreck anyway!

Just walk away and assume the original engineer put safety measures in place.

Isn’t returning “a URL’s full text” exactly what all web browsers do when you enter a URL and go to that website?

Even if a site has paywalls and stuff, it often still serves its full text to your web browser. Was ChatGPT just bypassing paywalls or was it serving text that wouldn’t normally be distributed to all users on a web browser?