• 2 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle







  • DessertStorms@kbin.socialtoAntiwork@lemmy.mlIt's true.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It may be simplistic to focus blame on some individual antagonist, but the one named is probably the one whose choices carried the greatest weight toward achieving the current condition of disaster.

    no, but feel free to continue focusing on a symptom rather than on the problem, and

    At any rate, as a champion of individual responsibility, he would happily accept, no doubt, his own.

    Lmfao, absolutely never happen


  • DessertStorms@kbin.socialtoAntiwork@lemmy.mlIt's true.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Lmfao, what the fuck do you think neoliberalism is?
    And yes, it is pointless voting for the centre left, for exactly that reason - they too are neoliberal (= capitalists = exactly the point I was making in my comment).
    You’re seriously not making the point you think you’re making lol



  • DessertStorms@kbin.socialtoAntiwork@lemmy.mlIt's true.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Don’t get me wrong, absolutely fuck Reagan and lady Reagan (Thatcher), but to ignore the framework that preceded them and enabled them to do what they did is being wilfully ignorant and is counter productive.

    Yeah, they fucked society up in their unique and terrible ways, but they are absolutely not the cause of our problems, just another symptom.

    The cause is capitalism (and before that, feudalism) and the varied systemic oppression and exploitation it relies on to exist.

    It is a tangible cause we can and should fight against, not a ghost to pointlessly shake a fist at for a quick dopamine hit.




  • DessertStorms@kbin.socialtoData Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Just to back up comrade @commie, let me copy pasta myself:

    In reality overpopulation is a myth and rather population decline is a real concern in many countries.
    Now of course we can talk about who this concerns and why (under the current system? It concerns those who need workers to exploit, white supremacists looking to “overturn” the “great replacement”, in some cases both, and it also concerns the aging population that will end up with very little support, something which wouldn’t be as big an issue if we had stronger communities, but alienation and all that jazz, as well as the fewer workers who will remain to keep the economy going for minimal pay as they get bossed around by AI, because capitalism), and also about who pushes the overpopulation myth and why, but the bottom line is - the population isn’t and never has been the problem (we already produce enough food to sustain everyone alive today and then some), it is capitalism and it’s dependence on creating infinite growth in a finite world, at the expense of everyone and everything on the planet (themselves included except for the handful who will end up in orbit or whatever. And then die) that is the problem, and what we need to get rid of if we want to stop this dystopian spiral.


  • Meanwhile I can still try to introduce more vegetarian meals to my diet.

    Again - solely in service of your own ego, they still killed the same amount of animals that day.

    It’s how capitalism works, they’re happy to throw the dead animals away, you’ve still spent your money in their supermarkets (which is perfectly fine, there is no ethical consumption under capitalism because they’ve given you no choice), and haven’t made a dent to the actual problem or moved even a nanometre closer to solving it.


  • DessertStorms@kbin.socialtoData Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yes, the solution is in regulations and criminalization of polution by corporation

    lol, no.
    The solution is in abolishing capitalism and building a sustainable society that isn’t built on exploitation and oppression as well as the rape of the planet.

    But you should still recycle.

    If you really want to, but you’re only serving your own ego, no one else, and definitely not the environment (because in the time you spend recycling, not to mention the time patting yourself on the back, and then the feeling like you’ve done your part so you don’t have to take any more action, the corporations running the plant let out another hundreds of times more pollution than you could ever recycle).
    But hey, you get to tell yourself you helped, and that’s what really matters, right?

    E: and just to be clear because I know how people love missing the point:
    I’m not advocating you litter or pollute or make things deliberately worse, I am saying - spend your time doing something effective (fight capitalism, not its symptoms, build solidarity and community in whatever way you can and is beneficial locally) instead of wasting it to serve no real purpose.




  • You should recycle regardless of the impact size compared to not having a child.

    except like 90% of recycling just goes in to landfill anyway.
    And even if it didn’t, your personal waste would be dwarfed on comparison to the industrial pollution corporations and militaries produce.

    But hey, keeping you recycling and feeling like you’ve done your part is a great way to make sure you don’t take aim at the root of the problem and those causing it.


  • Furthermore, this creates a feeling that some actions are nearly meaningless.

    They are.

    There’s very good reason that private jets for example aren’t on there, never mind the industrial stuff - they would make the points we see here completely invisible by comparison.

    Some may say I am childless so I can fly 3 times a year and have a lower impact than this family with two kids.

    both would have insignificant impact in the grand scheme of things.

    This is just more shifting responsibility to those who aren’t by those who are, to ensure they can continue undisturbed.


  • *I don’t mean killing them, just tax them to oblivion.

    For anyone still not paying attention - they will never ever let us do the one (they are literally planning their lives underground or in space for when the planet is no longer liveable, why anyone would think they would ever do anything to benefit anyone but themselves truly is beyond me), leaving us no choice but to resort to the other.