• 0 Posts
  • 76 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2025

help-circle
  • Audiobookshelf is probably what you’re after.

    It supports both e-books and audiobooks. It has a web interface and a native Android app. It saves your reading/audiobook progress in your account so you will always be in the same spot no matter which way you access it. It also allows you to make multiple accounts if you have multiple users.

    Docker/Podman containers available and it’s possible to run the server on Windows, if you’re into that kind of thing.

    Here’s the docs: https://www.audiobookshelf.org/docs


    Web UI:

    Browsing a Library:

    spoiler

    Browsing e-book info:

    spoiler

    Reader and chapter selection:

    spoiler

    And, I’m going to guess that you like statistics:

    spoiler

    e: Put the images in spoilers to save the reader’s scrolling strength e2: oops header tag is double #, not single x.x



  • I’m mostly looking for something that works out of the box without needing too much setup.

    Sir, this is a c/selfhosted.

    Building systems to solve problems is the hobby. You understand the motivation, you have a problem and there are not any easy solutions. At this level it’s a lot like working with Legos, there’s a bunch of software that you can snap together to get result that you’re looking for, though you will sometimes need some scripts to glue it all together.

    But if you know any simple way to plug LLM into Beeper without getting too technical, would love to hear about it.

    n8n is useful for creating arbitrary AI workflows. Designing a workflow is mostly graphical though a bit of simple scripting could be useful, depending on your requirements. It looks like it has a Matrix node already: https://docs.n8n.io/integrations/builtin/app-nodes/n8n-nodes-base.matrix/

    Typically a coding LLM can cover your bases on this kind of simple scripting, even if you don’t personally know how to code (though, as with all LLM code output, test it on dummy data before you plug it into production).









  • Yes, exactly.

    I know they don’t teach this in outrage school but making negative generalizations about a gender is bigotry, misandry specifically. It doesn’t become any less of a negative generalization about men if you add a a few qualifiers.

    I made a negative generalization about misandrist Blahj users and you got upset. Unless you are actually a literal misandrist Blahj user and were upset at me calling you out specifically then the comment wasn’t about you and yet you felt compelled to reply. It seems like you get the point.

    Is this any better?:

    70% of all blahj users are Misandrist.

    Does the percentage makes it less of a negative generalization or do you understand the point that I was making?