Well yeah they are public? Lemmy is indexed by Google. I imagine everything on here is as well.

It’s not exactly hard. It’s really simple. It’s just shit to use.

That is what the article says. Windows is definitely becoming a harder target and Linux is becoming way more common.

Linux’s customisability and use of a huge range of different softwares means there’s likely to be many more attack vectors.

It is correct. Half is 3/6 a third is 2/6. So a half is one third larger than 1/3

My git gui has a tick box on that prompt to specifically include added files. I now see why haha

Every new project for me starts with setting up git. There’s no reason not to. It takes seconds.

Lookup Unix socks

I just use the HashCode class and compare the results.

That is completely incomprehensible lol

This argument just doesn’t hold up. Software written by some of the best developers in the world still has these same bugs.

Why even use a language where you have to put so much effort into something that comes for free in many modern languages.

Every time I create a new repo haha I usually just delete the runs and squash the commits so it looks like I got it first time.

Indeed. But the pdf file itself isn’t the issue here. They very clearly don’t know what serialisation is.

And while there are risks with java serialisation it isn’t being deserialized here.

It’s literally just the format of the file here. If you skip the java serialisation header it’s a normal pdf file. I said nothing about the pdf file itself.

I did explain what it is. I just don’t know why certain programs encode it this way. It’s supported by multiple pdf readers so it must be semi common but I can’t find a reason for it to be encoded this way.

I’m trying to help you out there’s no need to be a dick.

The file is a serialised java array that contains a pdf file. I’ve seen a few things online about this. Some pdf readers accept it, some don’t.

And I’m not sure why an application would output a pdf this way. But there’s nothing harmful going on.

You’re kind of freaking out about nothing.

2.6% increase in thread ops when copying data from user space seems pretty significant.

402 Payment Required: when they ask you to stay on late

411 Length Required: bad date. Don’t ask

413 Payload Too Large: great date

No it’s not. It’s pedantic and arguing semantics. It is essentially useless and a waste of everyone’s time.

It applies a statistical model and returns an analysis.

I’ve never heard anyone argue when you say they used a computer to analyse it.

It’s just the same AI bad bullshit and it’s tiring in every single thread about them.

I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don’t think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.

I mean they literally do analyze text. They’re great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.

Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.

Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.

I’m not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.

One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to “understand” context.

They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.