

It says in the article
Unlike conventional batteries, supercapacitors have an exceptionally long lifespan, lasting hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles, whereas lithium batteries typically last only five years or less.
It says in the article
Unlike conventional batteries, supercapacitors have an exceptionally long lifespan, lasting hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles, whereas lithium batteries typically last only five years or less.
It doesn’t say what type of capacitor is used
Yes, it does. They’re supercapacitors.
Removed by mod
The most likely scenario is that the person with first-hand knowledge misinterpreted the situation.
Exactly. Which is why I started with questions so you could explain more. That’s how a conversation works and prevents it from getting toxic.
These poor men and their sensitive feelings…
Case and point.
Removed by mod
Hey! That’s “Mr Moron” to you.
I don’t think it’s a pun. It’s an actual person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Fowler_(software_engineer)
I don’t get:
Reed Hucks (“Redics”? What does that mean?)
Ann Vars
Heather Net
High suicide rate is connected to men more likely to have access to guns
High male suicide rates happen even without access to guns.
The idea of “the male loneliness epidemic” is meme that just generates tons of clicks and engagement. It’s not real.
Show me your receipts.
For the work place it’s again a problem of gender expectations.
You don’t think it’s internal drivers? That man are driven to perform internally and externally?
Men are actually more likely to get custody of they ask for it.
how should women help with male loneliness?
I wasn’t insinuating that women should help with male loneliness. I don’t think women have the answer here.
With the entire context, there IS a wage gap.
Which I included in my post. No context missed, glad we cleared that up.
next time a woman you know complains their male coworker makes more go ahead and tell her to work more, I bet she’ll just love that.
No, I’d tell her to lawyer up because the business better have a legal reason.
Also, the part of the paper you’ve cherry picked suits your narrative
Yes, I chose the part of the paper that supported my argument.
So what? Is it out of context? Nope.
The point you’ve made here seems to be … if anyone wants to make money you have to give up your life to do so.
You literally sell your time (life) to get money. That is what a wage is. Want more money? Sell more time.
I’m not saying that is a bad or good thing. I’m stating straight facts.
Ah yes, being a reasonable, empathetic member of society. “BoOtStRaPs!!1!”
The majority of lads are growing up without father figures, and yet we expect them to be functional males once they are adults.
If that’s not bootstraps, then I don’t know what is.
Being a fascist isn’t going to fix that
I never claimed that was a viable choice.
I’m a depressed male, I have attended therapy, I have talked with those close to me, I have been in dark times, and I’m hella lonely.
Then you of all people should know that there’s not much out there that is going to help you get to the next level. Imagine a world where you never had to go through dark times, or attend therapy, because the way you were brought up prepared you for those times. And gave you the emotional tools to navigate support networks.
Imagine stability.
In addition to being less likely than men to say they are currently the boss or a top manager at work, women are also more likely to say they wouldn’t want to be in this type of position in the future. More than four-in-ten employed women (46%) say this, compared with 37% of men. Similar shares of men (35%) and women (31%) say they are not currently the boss but would like to be one day. These patterns are similar among parents.
The wage gap exists because women have reasonable expectations for work-life balance (one reason). Men are culturally expected to rise and grind.
This isn’t the win that wage gap enthusiasts think it is. It’s essentially saying:
Wanna get paid more? Be a corporate whore.
these men need to communicate better
They need to …
They need to …
They need to …
There’s those bootstraps I was talking about.
… from my perspective.
Did … did you even read my post? What is going on?
Let me re-write it using your analogy.
Why not both? Food for minorities and food for majorities.
This isn’t a zero sum game.
If the majorities repeatedly votes for … a large detriment to everyone else
I never argued for this. It is possible to vote in a commensalistic manner.
This is why:
“It ain’t stupid if it works.”
is fundamentally incorrect.