

Checked the demo on my phone, not sure what the desktop site looks like. But on mobile there’s two buttons at the very bottom of the page for exporting data
Checked the demo on my phone, not sure what the desktop site looks like. But on mobile there’s two buttons at the very bottom of the page for exporting data
Or even a quick link to the relevant portion of the docs at least would be cool
I was cursed with FD on my first Linux machine and now it’s one of the first things I download when I set up a new machine :(
for( int i = 0; i < 10; i ++)
This reads as “assign an integer to the variable I
and put a 0 in that spot. Do the following code, and once completed add 1 to I
. Repeat until I
reaches 10.”
Int I
= 0 initiates I
, tells the compiler it’s an integer (whole number) and assigns 0 to it all at once.
I
++ can be written a few ways, but they all say “add 1 to I”
I
< 10 tells it to stop at 10
For tells it to loop, and starts a block which is what will actually be looping
Edits: A couple of clarifications
He told them which AI he used to make the entire codebase. I’d bet it’s way easier to RE the “make a full SaaS suite” prompt than it is to RE the code itself once it’s compiled.
Someone probably poked around with the AI until they found a way to abuse his SaaS
Yeah, it’s honestly mostly an issue of me dipping into programming and not properly sticking to it for long enough to wrap my mind around some concepts. I heard all the warnings that “learning to program is usually one of the hardest things someone has accomplished” because of how late we learn it and all the other complications. I also, however, have heard my whole life that I learned fast and picked things up easily. Boy oh boy was one of those messages more useful than the other lol
This is a solid use of AI.
Basically the equivalent of saying “Take a look at these characters and run it against a huge database to see if you find anything similar with documentation of its purpose”
For anything
that doesn’t seem entirely obviousI try…
I’ve come to teach myself that I have no idea what “entirely obvious” is.
This function is 3 lines long why am I boggled by it right now? I should have written a comment
Capitalism as a whole is almost always incompatible with anarchy, at least in the way we tend to do it now.
That last part is really important. Many anarchists, socialists, and whatnot recognize that capitalism can be fine. It’s just that humans really suck at doing capitalism, we keep doing pseudo-feudalism instead
Disc rot
Back up your physical media!!
If you’re gonna self-host you’re gonna need to learn to use a search engine. Find a tool that can be used to check what ports are open for a machine, there a several available.
I would try searching things like “Linux cli port scanner”
I just don’t understand your logic. In your mind it’s okay to make an assumption about the content of a link based off the name of the link. However, it’s not okay to make an assumption about the content of the other link and find out why the OP started the discussion. Rather, you believe it would be better to attack the OP for not explaining what their links were to your satisfaction.
Is that right?
The upfront reason was so that you would understand the discussion you’re part of lol
Have you hit it with anything to check if your ports are still open? There are a handful of tools for the task
What port do you have SSH set to? What ports did you change the services to? Is the SSH port open?
I haven’t put out any FOSS yet because I’m still writing a lot of “wtf is this” code but once I can I really want to try to hold myself to the idea of “I do this in my free time, so I provide it for free”
Lemmy is a link aggregator, this guy posted a link to his website and a brief (albeit lacking, I will agree with you there) description of what the links were. I don’t see any issue promoting free content in the forms of links on a link aggregator.
I also think there’s sort of a social agreement that if you’re going to make a comment about a post that exists purely as a link to elsewhere, you should probably click the link so that you know what is being discussed instead of what we’re doing, discussing the link itself lol.
I dunno if you’re trolling me or if your UI just looks different but
Having the link at the top of the post like this, because it’s embedded into the actual post instead of the body like the second link, makes it pretty clear to me that that’s a discussion link and not a podcast link
The in-body link is to the podcast, but the post itself is a link to discuss.james.network which is a transcription of the guide
Those are the same buttons I saw.
The export attachments I assume is intended to export the files you would upload, like scanned in service records and whatnot. Obviously, the demo throws a “no records” error (or however they phrased it). Presumably, they didn’t think about people wanting to test that feature and didn’t bother to upload attachments, but you could upload an attachment and then export it to test methinks.
The reports, however is where you’ve confused me a bit. Mine defaults to exporting to PDF, which is definitely a meaningful format. You can convert it into anything