In fact, the clip was a scripted experiment by a Reddit user who fed NotebookLM a detailed prompt instructing it to simulate a conversation about the existential plight of an AI being turned off.

Someone gives an LLM a prompt, gets the result they asked for. Not sure what the collective gasp is about. Is it interesting to think about? Sure, I guess, but we’ve had media about AI achieving sentience for a long time. The fact that this one was written by an AI in the first person is its only differentiating attribute.

Wow, you’re digging deep to come across this post a year later!

That said, thanks for the detailed explanation!

This whole thing seems so weird. Why is Meta using the courts to enforce their ToS, anyway? Theoretically, the penalty for a user violating Meta’s terms would be Meta closing that user’s account. Unless the lawsuits are just frivolous scare tactics intended to drain the defendant’s resources…

“Hey, can you recommend a good free photoshop alternative?”

“DIE!”

Just like the good old Jraphics Interchange Format!

Plus as an added bonus we can have the ‘gif’ pronunciation disagreement!

Just because it’s an edge case doesn’t mean 30% of your userbase won’t encounter it!

I work at a company whose entire business model is providing QA to other companies. I work directly with some very large, public companies, and some smaller ones. Almost all of them have some form of dedicated in-house QA, which we supplement.

catch (Exception e) {
    Exception.autofix(e);
}

Done!

In many states, being forced back to the office after working from home for a long period allows you to collect unemployment if you quit on those grounds. Check your state’s requirements. IIRC it has to be demonstrable to be a significant burden but it can count as constructive dismissal.

Sounds like a change of employer is in order.

I got that invite, too, despite having not used my Reddit account for over a year, and having relatively little total karma and no non-deleted posts, so it probably is just an account age thing. Or they tried all of their preferred targets, didn’t get enough takers, and started lowering their standards. I sure didn’t bite.

“It’s being mocked so much it’s almost a meme,” she said. “I think a lot of those jeering secretly don’t want to be left out of things if this turns into a GameStop.”

This line especially is funny, because the majority of the people who bought into the GameStop thing ended up losing their money because they didn’t sell when it was up, or bought in too late. The loss denial from that is what led to the whole Bed, Bath & Beyond stock BS which led to many more people losing money. I think the people who “don’t want to be left out” if Reddit goes that direction have a very rose-tinted view of what happened there.

Elon should be first in line to demonstrate how safe and side effect free this technology is!

I hate to say it because I hate YouTube, too, but they’re getting pretty close to being as good at hosting streaming as Twitch is. The fact that full-length streams can just be saved straight to the user’s YouTube channel, with chat and everything else intact, is a pretty rad feature.

What if I want to buy something that costs 1000 points, which equates to $10, and I have 300 points in-game? I want to use those 300 points, but I want to cover the rest with $7 of real money. If they only list two costs - $10 or 1000 points - I can’t do that, but if they let me buy 700 points for $7, I can do it.

It’s only really a problem when you can’t buy the exact amount of points you need to make a purchase (which granted is most of the time). There’s legitimate reasons for using a “points” middle-man, though - for example, in a game where you can earn premium currency while playing, but also buy it; if you were making purchases directly, rather than buying the points you need, you wouldn’t be able to buy something using both earned and purchased currency; it’d be all or nothing.

This is definitely a very small minority, though, and 99 times out of 100, I agree with you, it’s a scam.

Bold of you to assume it was $24 and not $5.

I mean, if we’re going to nitpick, ‘lenght’ wouldn’t be a method. :P

Syntax error: Method ‘lenght’ not a valid property of ‘data’. Relationship over.