I speak languages.
= HEX19
I don’t know how to but this more clearly. The distance between the top and the bottom of the coloured strip at any given year; the thickness; represents the annual revenue.
This is actually a pretty common format for representing the evolution of parts in a total, because you can clearly see the share, the combined revenue and the total revenue over the years (that’s the area). It is just that this one has been made symmetrical because it is easier to follow and just more pretty.
I do agree, but there not being a literal soul doesn’t mean it cannot be used in a metaphorical sense. Much like you can still talk about choice even if free will isn’t real.
The width is proportional to the revenue.
Fair point. I do suppose it makes some sense, since otherwise the small ones would be barely visible slices, while they are more concentrated here.
Well I found it on Mastodon.
Per capita is latin for per head; per person. The UK spent $12k per person.
Life expectancy as a function of spending is parabolic confirmed? New theory: if you spend more than $22,000 on healthcare per capita, life expectancy will be negative
You’re welcome! You were right to ask.
Expenditure on health gives a measure of the final consumption of health goods and services (i.e. current health expenditure). This includes spending by all types of financing arrangements (such as government-based programmes, social insurance and out-of-pocket spending) on medical services and goods, population health and prevention programmes, as well as administration of the health system.
Nah, pretty sure that is just a (very mild) hallucination because it couldn’t find an actual good example