

Apparently this is about neither DRM
It’s not about the DRM people think about… but the Direct Rendering Manager
Apparently this is about neither DRM
It’s not about the DRM people think about… but the Direct Rendering Manager
Wouldn’t it be great if just one company per 10 articles about European companies “looking for alternatives” was actually ditching US services for European alternatives?
UEFI standard requires support for FAT and then can implement other file systems for the EFI System Partition.
But no vendor actually implements any with the exception of those forced to include APFS by Apple. So FAT is the de facto standard for all ESPs for years.
I actually like what Steam did for Linux gaming in general, but in the end it is slowly becoming a crutch. Why should I spin up the Steam client (that is neither fast nor easy on resources, too) every time I want to play a non-steam game?
Again… it’s nice what Valve is doing in general and that most of the stuff is open source and thus can be back ported to Wine.
I however find it concerning that the number of people doing so seems to be constantly decreasing. And I don’t actually understand why the majority of gamers -people that are insanely obsessed with very small FPS or other perfomance increases sometimes- seems to be content with using Steam as the one-size-fits-all solution for games. Just simple Wine Staging can often match the performance for older games, for all games once you start backporting some patches and fixes developed for Proton. And yet the contributors seem to get less by the day and a lot of projects pre-compiling patched Wine versions are vanishing for a lack of interest.
In short: I don’t get that voluntary lock-in to Steam for very little convenience of having a fancy interface for starting your games.
Sounds like every perfectly normal load-bearing wall I have ever seen…
Yet sometimes the only reasonable guess is that they coded in undocumented brainfuck.
Activists and consumer groups can do a better job exploiting social media virality to reach young Americans.
I actually doubt they can, as the algorithms controlling visibility are all about money and they can’t compete in that regard with those big actors actively working for the stultification of people.
Also: not an US problem at all, but a global one.
I am very unique… solely based on the the referer 🤣
Yes, I read the article (that’s were my “number of lines” come from…). But does including this in the article make a shitty article any better?
It’s basically “Linux kernel hits record low” (also the title) followed by “but by other metrics it looks different” and then… nothing. No actual analysis, no context. Just randomly presenting numbers (and even admitting their headline metric isn’t worth much) and pretending that’s an article.
That’s stupidly lazy…
Because “number of commits” is such a relevant metric (for reference 85% of the commits resulted in 110% of added lines compared to 2023).
Are people too lazy to talk about actual features and stuff added, so they compare some arbitrary number because that’s a stat easily pulled from the data?
PS: Nice to see the comments talking about “woke” developers… Guess the culture war brain rot really spreads everywhere 🤮
But then developers refuse to support that. With missing kernel-level stuff just being an excuse for being intentionally Linux-hostile…
Which are barely more than a first step as they are just the bare minimum with everything else being proprietary and pushed to userspace.
That’s a build-in sudo feature, set by Defaults insults
in your sudoers file.
*einmal den Certbot umarm*
Don’t we all know that guy, who is rather stupid and useless but at least has proper standards?
Fair…
PS: Wait… that’s a hobby and they don’t get paid for lying? That’s even worse than I thought.
It has lots of small issues that add up to a frustrating experience for mainstream users.
And 90%(1) those are out of Linux’ actual resposibility because they are caused by third parties screwing up… sometimes even intentional (from companies producing lackluster drivers only having a fix cobbled together for Windows specifically -looking at Realtek networking for example- to ones actually going out of their way to block Linux (MS FUD included…).
(1) The other 10% exist on Windows or Mac also, but people just accept them because they are used to not having a chance to change it. Seriously the amount of obscure regedits or third party tools usually surpass the number of linux issues fixed by editing an easy to read txt file.
There is a difference here.
Unlocking home later in the boot process is not a problem, so the you can indeed have a keyfile on your root and get your home unlocked and mounted after root is done.
Swap however needs to be available early, at least if you want to use it for hibernation.
This is just a theory but maybe worth a thought:
Could it be possible that acceptance in a certain community up to the point where it’s just a non-issue that is totally separated from what the community does, bring a lot of people to the public view that exist everywhere else, too, just not that openly?
There was in fact some minor friction on IT events some years ago where people objected to stuff partly looking more like a pride event. Yet the majority didn’t care and there was barely any active pushback. And so it normalised very quickly and now it is just how it is. In my personal view at least for the benefit of all involved.