Why is OP banned

How much do you tolerate before switching sides? Think about Windows vs Linux. People don’t switch.

Once you are ready to go public though you need to be stable and secure

Is that really true though? If you have a product people actually want, they’ll use it regardless of bugs

Going slow doesn’t mean you don’t break things either. If you don’t want to break things, you need test plans, logging and alerts

If we find out “I do not consent” opts out, I’m fine with it.

Why? They don’t need more money. Jellyfin proves how much of their service can be done for free

I have access to ~20Gb/s worth of extra bandwidth. Is there any way I can “donate” it to different Peertube instances? Right now I just use it to seed things and run XMR/I2P nodes

1. Finish off Firefox
2. Break up Chrome
3. Profit

You are mostly correct, some additional insight from someone who works with security/privacy stuff:

That is different in the EU I grant you

Even in the EU, when a user requests to delete their data, you’re allowed to keep enough to validate they were a previous rule-breaker so they can’t just delete their data and re-register

The session staying open is bad security though.

There isn’t enough context to say for sure, but in general this is standard practice. JWTs, probably the most widely adopted standard for authorization on the web, have an expiry date and cannot be revoked. Yes it’s not great security, but I want to emphasize this is standard practice. Google, Apple, Meta, Slack, etc all do this.

Also, when you request data deletion, the companies have up to a month to do it. I’m not sure if OP expected it to be instant, but it doesn’t have to be

I hate this attitude of “well if you can’t get a professional therapist, figure out how to get one anyways”. There needs to be an option for people who either can’t afford or can’t access a therapist. I would have loved for AI to fill that gap. I understand it won’t be as good, but in many regions the wait-list for therapy is far too long, and something is better than nothing

About 3 percent of students in the study had positive mental health outcomes, reporting that talking to the chatbot “halted their suicidal ideation.” But researchers also found “there are some cases where their use is either negligible or might actually contribute to suicidal ideation.”

This is referring to a bot designed to help with people struggling with mental health, and is actually a big one. That number is way too low.

Maybe a big miscalculation to adopt it. The lead developer lists many important reasons for dropping it, including:

• None of their users actually care for it
• Lead dev does not have the time for it
• Chimera’s innovation is not hardware side
• Risc hardware is very slow

It finally happened!?!

At my company we allocate 20% of our time on “Better engineering”, and it counts as impact when you’re up for bonuses/raises so people actually have a reason to push to do it

That’s actually pretty neat

Lmaoo the webpage has a prompt injection

The problem is many government and need-to-live-comfortably services tend to require a non-dumb phone, and the number of services is only increasing

Just set the temperature to zero, duh

For all the memes about programmers quitting and wanting to take up a simple life? Yea, I can see this working out

(Caveat: Life as a bartender is only simple if you don’t need to worry about money, like ex-programmers)

??? What is the context of this obvious lie

It lets you sign up as a country outside the EU and sign it