BRB, writing a virus in COBOL.

There are domains you can register privately, if that’s a concern.

The main advantage is not having an admin block you from talking to certain people by defederating the instance they use.

What happened? Why did github block them?

Helium was interesting, but they locked it down so you can only use their proprietary hardware for access points, it seems kinda scammy.

IPFS is used by several archive projects like Anna’s archive and libgen.

Meshtastic is a distributed local mesh network for text messaging.

Neat, shame it doesn’t work if you feed it a category link though.

There are licences like this already

• https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:THL-1.1
• https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:ANTI-1.4
• https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:HESSLA

None of which have ever caught on, and none of which are open source.

You would also be making it potentially illegal to use in many countries.

Honestly, between this and not all the modules being open source I would personally avoid it, seen too many projects openbait and then go “open core”.

I think this is designed for that https://github.com/vroland/epdiy

Their guide still implies that you need to pay a fee to unlock an API key before you can flash a new firmware.

How they plan to enforce that fee to unlock an API key when the firmware is supposedly open source I don’t know. When I looked over the source code it looked like it was being written to a log.

It may be. The ICO issued some long waffling guidelines that clarified exactly nothing about it recently https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/online-tracking/consent-or-pay/about-this-guidance/#law

My non lawyer, and probably wrong, advice is to send them a polite reply asking them to refer to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

Looking at some of the bug reports it looks like your dependency may already be using the MMU.

Is there a reason you didn’t use the ESP-S3’s MMU? https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32s3/api-reference/system/mm.html

Is federation still whitelist based?

Most if not all of that has been debunked https://stallmansupport.org/debunking-false-accusations-against-richard-stallman.html

Removed by mod

What licence did it use before?

No, it’s licence violates, well, pretty much the entire open source definition

Static

Javascript

Has someone changed the meaning of static? I’ve always thought it meant the opposite of Dynamic HTML

Looks like it has some issues when used with sponsorblock https://github.com/Andrews54757/FastStream/issues/16