

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
you could at least
Note: here “it would be nice if” is more polite, since the least one could have done is always
Good point, comrade. App services split to separate list.
Done and done
At the level of individual apps, the list explodes. Many progressive web apps can be hosted essentially for free on the potato, so you could shunt your always-on services to this machine to allow low power states on a beefier machine. For example:
Edit: list subitem formatting messed up
Edit: add common micro services, mobile deployment
Edit: add home theater suggestion
Edit: add always-on and PWA examples
Apple used to straight up steal the idea of existing apps. Lately it seems they favor buyout, like with dark cloud becoming weather, but it used to be that Apple would randomly swoop in and crush developers by creating a first party version of their app.
I think you can also register 10 years in advance, or maybe more depending on the registrar, which would cover all other potential snafus like expired card info.
deleted by creator
Ah! Been there. Allocating lanes on small systems always seems to have more trial and error than I expect.
And here’s that x4 SFP+ card: https://www.trendnet.com/products/10g-sfp-pcie-adapter/10-gigabit-pcie-sfp-network-adapter-TEG-10GECSFP-v2
deleted by creator
+1, also chocolatey
Maybe yeah. Also got the sense from the strong opinions that this is a preexisting debate, presumably in the context of continuous workloads or cached arrays with minimal spindown intervals. In that context it’s true that rotational disks still often win in energy efficiency and robustness (assuming we’re comparing them to consumer SSDs and not the latest enterprise u.2 stuff that’s rated for continuous work).
Not sure what everyone is arguing about here. Clearly SSD is better for intermittent r/w, whereas HDD can be more efficient at continuous r/w (especially in terms of watts/TB)
Just looking at specs should be enough to see that. SSDs can idle in ready state at close to 0 draw (~0.05w) whereas HDD requires continued rotation to remain ready. So consider an extreme case of writing for 1 minute then maintaining ready state for the rest of the day. For that the SSD will be far more efficient, obviously.
I don’t know, but I’d guess the buffered chipset controller has more stability during certain power state transitions.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
As a human, honestly I too would have thought there was a CLI package for the HuggingFace API.
Edit: there is (now at least) https://huggingface.co/docs/huggingface_hub/main/en/guides/cli
Looks good! Conky reminds me of [the long-defunct] rainmeter software, pretty good nostalgia.
Eleven. This OS was released in the time before the war. There never was a Windows Twelve.