Not quite the same, but asking it to invent themed cocktails can be a lot of fun.

Invent a drink for Taylor Hebert, as she sacrifices her self to save the world. Suggest accompanying music.

.

Hey Serdan 😊! I’ve invented a drink for Taylor Hebert called "The Queen’s Sacrifice"🍹.

Ingredients:

• 2 oz Butterfly pea flower tea (for its color-changing property)
• 2 oz Gin
• 1 oz Lemon juice 🍋
• 1 oz Honey syrup
• A dash of lavender bitters
• A lemon wheel for garnish

Instructions:

1. Brew the butterfly pea flower tea and let it cool.
2. In a shaker, combine gin, lemon juice, honey syrup, and lavender bitters.
3. Shake well with ice.
4. Strain the cocktail into a glass filled with ice.
5. Slowly pour the butterfly pea flower tea over the mixture, and observe as the color changes from blue to a beautiful purple hue.
6. Garnish with the lemon wheel.

As for accompanying music, I suggest “Heroes” by David Bowie 🎶, as it perfectly complements Taylor’s heroic sacrifice to save the world. Cheers 🥂!

It’s characters from a popular TV show as knitted figures.

Which works were sampled for this?

Looks like it’s not quite that simple in the UK.

https://realemploymentlawadvice.co.uk/2021/01/28/can-my-employer-make-me-pay-back-overpaid-wages/

I’m pretty sure that would have been illegal where I live. Paying someone the same amount each month is an implicit contract. You can’t just suddenly go “whoops” and not pay for a month.

I am not sure of the relevance of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter is the cravings of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter

Yeah, totally. Repeating the same nonsensical sentence over and over is also how I converse. 🙄

It’s fine if you think so, but then it’s a pointless argument over definitions.

You can’t have a conversation with autocomplete. It’s qualitatively different. There’s a reason we didn’t have this kind of code generation before LLM’s.

Adversus solem ne loquitor.

Does AlphaGo understand go? How about AlphaStar?

When I say LLM’s can understand things, what I mean is that there’s semantic information encoded in the network. A demonstrable fact.

You can disagree with that definition, but the point is that it’s absolutely not just autocomplete.

https://thegradient.pub/othello/

LLMs are neural networks and are absolutely capable of understanding.

I agree you should use a switch where applicable, but ternaries are the expression equivalent of if-else statements. If I have two conditions and a default, and each branch simply evaluates to a value of the same type, I’ll probably just use a ternary.

Yes, you need to read code to understand it. If else statements can also do the job of a switch, so the exact same argument applies.

PHP is the only language in existence with a left associative ternary operator. Ignoring PHP, the operator has worked exactly the same way for decades. And even PHP has now fixed the operator.

I don’t think it’s reasonable to avoid a very commonly supported pattern just because a single badly designed language implemented it wrong.

How is it unsafe?

In the given example I’d probably use a switch / match expression, but ternaries are usually more flexible than switches and I don’t think it’s an issue to write a nested ternary instead of if else statements.

Ternary expressions aren’t switches though

Why?

It’s perfectly readable.

We still have more jokes than anarchy chess, though