The_Decryptor

Well, all websites are written in JS (on the frontend)

Not true anymore unfortunately, some sites are using frameworks compiled to WASM instead.

e.g. X is apparently using Yew now.

Edit: Ok the “apparently” is doing heavy lifting, since now I can’t find the original source I read about it. Turns out “X” is a garbage name with no searchability, only an idiot would use it.

Yeah, but that’s still not a lot of data, like LTR/RTL shouldn’t be varying within a given script so the values will be shared over an entire range of characters.

Valve uses SDL for their own games, so this stuff would have been worked on internally and developed alongside the hardware itself.

But that’s the benefit of open source in the end, when done well everybody wins. Valve gets to ensure that any game using SDL can function perfectly with their hardware (Deck, Controller and Frame), any devs using SDL in their games knows they get first-party hardware support, and gamers get the benefit of both.

Windows doesn’t even have basic package management like every Unix-like OS does so you don’t have to individually update applications and go find them on the Internet

Funny thing is that it does (winget), but it’s a terminal app. Windows users who look down on Linux users for “needing” to use a terminal don’t want to bring it up, so Linux users also aren’t aware of it and never point to it as a counter example.

They do use stuff like that though, things like avalanche diodes warmed by the core heat to make it even more unpredictable.

But sometimes things don’t work the way they’re supposed to.

Þere must be a half dozen cheap ways to generate true random numbers.

The problem isn’t generating random data, it’s ensuring it’s “high quality” (It’s all statistical checks, you can’t know ahead of time what random numbers should look like, otherwise they’re not random)

That’s the problem the AMD chips seem to have, that function is failing and letting through low quality data it should otherwise reject.

Because it’s not about the files anymore, it’s the free space on the disk you care about (Or rather, the filesystem metadata describing it, the free-space bitmap in the case of exFAT)

If the files are highly fragmented and spread out, then the empty space around the files is also broken up and spread around, which makes it harder for a filesystem to efficiently store new stuff as it now has to break up and pack new file data into the gaps.

The headline makes this sound a lot worse than the article does.

From the article there’s basically a list of exemptions in the law that describes who doesn’t need to follow it (e.g. an online booking site for doctors visits), everybody else needs to check the rules to see if they do. And if they do, they then need to follow extra child safety rules (e.g. Roblox is opting out under-16s from open DMs by default)

GitHub can quite rightly say they don’t fall under the restrictions of the law, and that could be the end of it. The simple fact that it doesn’t have any form of private messaging feature is probably enough.

they’re just a radical left communist

God I wish that was remotely true

JXL is two separate image formats stuck together. An improved version of JPEG that can also losslessly and reversibly recode most existing JPEG images at a smaller size, and the PNG like format (evolved from FLIF/FUIF) that can do lossless or lossy encoding.

“VarDCT” (The improved JPEG) turns out to be good enough that the “Modular” mode (The FLIF/FUIF like one) isn’t needed much outside of lossless encoding. One neat feature of modular mode though is that it progressively encodes the image in different sizes, that is if you decode the stream as you read in bytes you start with a small version of the image and get progressively larger and larger output sizes until you get the original.

Why is that useful? Well you can encode a single high DPI image (e.g. 2x scale), and then clients on 1x scale monitors can just stop decoding the image at a certain point, and get a half sized image out of it. You don’t need separate per-DPI variants.

AVIF is funny because they kept the worst aspects of WebP (lossy video based encoding), while removing the best (lossless mode) There was an attempt at WebP2, using AV1 and a proper lossless mode, but Google killed that off as well.

But hey, now that they’re releasing AV2 soon, we’ll eventually have an incompatible AVIF2 to deal with. Good thing they didn’t support JPEG-XL, it’d just be too confusing to have to deal with multiple formats.

That’d just be overall worse, it’d never be smaller than a comparable JPEG image, and it wouldn’t allow for any compression/quality benefits.

Yep, their frontend used a shared caller that would return the parsed JSON response if the request was successful, and error otherwise. And then the code that called it would use the returned object directly.

So I assume that most of the backend did actually surface error codes via the HTTP layer, it was just this one endpoint that didn’t (Which then broke the client side code when it tried to access non-existent properties of the response object), because otherwise basic testing would have caught it.

That’s also another reason to use the HTTP codes, by storing the error in the response body you now need extra code between the function doing the API call and the function handling a successful result, to examine the body to see if there was actually an error, all based on an ad-hoc per-endpoint format.

Ehh, that really feel like “But other people do it wrong too” to me, half the 4xx error codes are application layer errors for example (404 ain’t a transport layer error, neither is 403, 415, 422 or 451)

It also complicates actually processing the request as you’ve got to duplicate error handling between “request failed” and “request succeeded but actually failed”. My local cinema actually hits that error where their web frontend expects the backend to return errors, but the backend lies and says everything was successful, and then certain things break in the UI.

Well no, the HTTP error codes are about the entire request, not just whether or not the actual header part was received and processed right.

Like HTTP 403, HTTP only has a basic form of authentication built in, anything else needs the server to handle it externally (e.g. via session cookies). It wouldn’t make sense to send “HTTP 200” in response to trying to access a resource without being logged in just because the request was well formed.

Sudo is worth redoing regardless of language.

Or move away from it entirely, e.g. to something like doas which OpenBSD migrated to a decade ago.

And unsurprisingly, a majority of the comments on that post are complaining about systemd.

I want my NKRO.

Which can be done over USB, cheap keyboards just aren’t wired for it.

Well that’s disappointing.

The funny thing is that for the longest time Intel actually had the majority share of GPUs, just by counting the ones embedded in motherboards of laptops and the like. No idea if that’s still the case, or if Nvidia or AMD has been eating into it with their new models (e.g. what powers the Steam Deck)

They’ve tried to break into the discrete market a few times, most recently with their Arc cards, but the way they approach things is just so odd. It’s like they assume the first attempt will be a smash hit and dominate, and when it doesn’t they just flounder? The Arc cards launched to a lot of fanfare and then there was just silence and delays from Intel.