Python

…so… so you made it single threaded?

[ Their after hours hobby of illegally breaking into computers and websites ]

Research projects:

“I’ve set the wedding date. I’m not sure they exist.”

All answers should be given in mspaint

im_in_danger.exe

yeah shit sign me up.

…my insubordinate foreskin had sealed itself up into a penis tortellini.

Hahahah.

My neighbour is covered in my piss. What the fuck do you do to survive this.

AHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHHHHAAAAHAHAHAHAAH

Is this… tilted slightly?

Am I leaning?

Ahem…

Qgis? (err well, qfield/ qcloud…)

Representation matters. Being correct matters.

The orchid you showed is not a vanilla. That is a staged shot with some other random orchid. The one I showed is from one of the many many Vanilla vines that I grow. They are not remotely the same.

The flower in the logo is very clearly a Plumaria.

Look if you dont know fuck about shit when it comes to flowers and plants, thats fine. But maybe don’t have an opinion then. However if you name your OS after a plant, and then proceed to butcher its presentation, you should be prepared for push back.

No they dont.

Not even close.

The flower in the logo is a radially symmetrical five petaled flower, with overlapping petals in a whorl. A vanilla flower is a bilaterally symmetrical three petaled flower with a fused labellum/ and column. They look nothing alike.

The Vanilla flower picture I posted is from April and is literally growing on a Plumaria (which the logo obviously is). I’m going to walk outside and edit this response and add a picture from that Plumaria.

Ok. So why are we having what looks like a plumaria flower to represent a vanilla OS?

Do you need a picture of a vanilla flower?

I came across these guys a while ago.

https://www.wikihouse.cc/

That or dumb money is just dumb, and if the cost of money is free, you can just guess at things that might work with thousands of monkeys hitting typewriters.

Ahem. I don’t see the Lemmy app on there.

🫑

once you get it (…) it’s pretty clear

Thats… thats not what that means.

I love the concept of this figure, and I like how the right panel is built to present, but the actual results mapped onto the triangle are hard to figure out. Like this is the actual experiment they ran , but its not clear what represents what. Seems like maybe a density map might be more appropriate.