Yeah but you merged as you wanted, usually anyway.

And hard casting onto the wrong class because a neat function lives in there (who will detect you did that and treat you a little different because you don’t have all the resuired data in that class instance) as a “quick fix”

Code was written before git was invented.

If you have a system based on precedent I guess, but I don’t think the EU has that.

Removed by mod

Yeah that seems like something that can’t be put into a law. Well normally.

One main difference with IPFS is that you can change the shared data without having to re-distribute a new link. It’s also based on reciprocal sharing instead of benevolent sharing, which means that if someone shares then it grows the sharing capability of the network instead of using it up.

I have made some comparatifs, you are all welcome posting any questions you have here or there ofc. ☺️ !

Sort of P2P, it’s a sharing system based on reciprocal sharing (I share yours because you share mine), add sharing the same data several times and you get robustness.

A sort of decentralised file system.

Please let me know what you think about it all.

PS. Funkwhale seems interesting, gotta check that out, thanks!

Thanks, I edited in a quick link and the dumbass is me not you!

Ah, a photo model!

int $ = 3;

Compiled with msvc back in the day for example, could be stuff like that. But IDK.

I bet they are all good, but I’m a Mint newbie too, well since a couple of years now! Works charmingly well for me.

I remember those keyboards, if I hit that button my PC just hard crashed. Fantastic.

They’re downvoted because the OS prompts it every time. Not only when it’s needed.

It’s like the doctor says you better do a full checkup every time you see them and every time the results are perfectly okay. Sure, maybe one day they’ll be right but it’s not the correct way to do things.

Still can’t open a local file because of “CORS”

Then you stick a usb key in and invariably get the “windroze has detected a problem with the drive, scan or format?”

Do nothing and the drive works perfectly well.

And your code is unmaintainable, has no unit tests and needs someone with the mindset of a 15 yo to “fix it” all the time, or so it seems.

Good luck learning to code for real with that mindset.

And automatic test systems. It’s not that hard.

You must tackle that with being underpaid!

/j

That’s wild, I have worked on large scientific software, coupled with electron microscopes (off all kind of types, bio, material, big, small) and we had over 700 types of processings of different data and visualisation. Without OOP in there it would have been a one man orchestra-mess per client.

We had those people clinging to their scripts too, they were actually the best getting the results out from bad aquisitions, but it’s kind of complicated because it’s not the scripts that are important but the dude using them.

The OOP was good because it tied it all together (you could easily string compute modules together to form new treatments of data for example), that’s not needed in a small, one-situation setup, but still I’d code something to manage it all if I were you (and had the possibility to do so ofc), maybe your gui does that. But then again, I don’t know how it all works where you work so what do I know 🤷🏻‍♀️.

Cheers