What? The reason is that academia does not rewards competency and innovative research. It rewards ability to gather funds, and to streamline paper production. Professors nowadays are often “technically” average, but extremely good startup ceos
We, as society, have become dumb and mean… It’s a pity
If you read the article you find out. Unfortunately this kind of stories are the norm of modern academia
All best old-school emeritus professors I met in my life were absolutely certain they wouldn’t have had a career in modern academia.
This story doesn’t surprise anyone unfortunately
Not even a pure mckinsey type of company value kpis over stakeholders’ feedbacks. If a company is purely kpi driven, it is a bad company, as kpi cannot catch everything, but have limited and specific scope. Your managers should go back to their MBAs, and revise their stakeholder management skills. If a manager get a feedback that one of their team members is jeopardizing a project and the relationship with clients due to taking responsibilities and tasks for which they have no competency, it is extremely bad. In this case is even proved by the fact that the company must spend resources lowering the clients expectations. Managers should absolutely act. If this doesn’t happen, the managerial side of your company is pretty broken
Best practice is to clearly state that PM here is not competent for its job, either he finds a solution himself (e.g. he manages expectations of clients without admitting he fucked up) or he has to be replaced.
This kind of situation is very dangerous. PM shouldn’t take similar decisions, nor promising anything
Why do you have a project manager discussing technical solutions? That’s kind of… very wrong. Most PMs nowadays have a just a slightly better technical background than a secretary…
That’s borderline criminal. Nothing more to add
As far as I understand, these are posix requirements https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
Powershell is not compliant with that document even now in the interactive part. Wsl2 is, as one can istall a standard Linux shell
Thanks, this explains:
The Windows NT POSIX subsystem did not provide the interactive user environment parts
So the interactive part, the shell itself, is not compliant. That is why I was confused
How can it be? It’s oo. Not saying you’re wrong. Honestly curious
Upvoted for your courage!
They can group them, drill down, there are many way to make them readable. That’s the actual work of data visualization: simplify something complex to convey a message, leading the reader to the relevant data that support the message, letting them understand it.
Here nothing is readable with the exception of the big polygons, and data are absolutely unclear even when the polygon is visible
Data is awful… What was wrong with bar charts?
It is partially. But if someone uses excel professionally their requirements are pretty high. Tbf, I don’t know the details because I never use it, but calc is behind excel for professional use as far as I understand
Depends on the task. It is much better for ml, ai, scientific computing and high performance computing in general, developers…
But I use libreoffice only for cover letters and cvs.
If excel is needed, Linux is a problem
I don’t see anything wrong in this picture. ML == funny!
“AI Casino” vs “old school nights banging heads on books”
Edit. Guys, it was a joke, do I really need to put /s?
It targets router firmwares though… These bot farms do not usually target real gnu/Linux os, because it is easier and more effective to attack router firmwares that are not well configured by producers and telcoms, and are practically never upgraded.
Therefore they are not a real threat for standard mint or popOS user… Let alone gentoo users
I use python professionaly. Never seen a real successful supply chain attack on libraries used by “normal” people. There was recently a supply chain attack to pytorch, that I remember, but it was solved within few hours.
It is not a real risk for non developers. It is a risk, but veeery low, miles lower than pdf.exe.
Just check this stat for ransomwares taken as an example of viruses: https://www.statista.com/statistics/701020/major-operating-systems-targeted-by-ransomware/
Windows server is ~20% of server market. Still it is there second, with in practice no GNU/linux (80% of server market). This is why people do not really worry much, the risk exists, but it is minimal for well configured system compared to competition, even where competitors are a niche and Linux machines are the main target.
On windows, an antivirus is not a bad idea… On Linux, a firewall and basic care are usually sufficient
How is romance so high? It is a genre where 99% of movie is a pile of stereotypes put together by an amazon warehouse robot.
I am calling for mislabelling. Many dramas are probably also labeled as “romance” because main characters are a couple in some kind of relationship
Edit. Reading better the graph this is for sure the case. What movie illiterate labeled forrest gump as romance?