

Thanks, the Grampa here are learning.
Thanks, the Grampa here are learning.
But they probably have a graphic that show a point up, this is all a CEO needs to change something like this. Specially now they are IBM
Tools that generate errors, so that you have to go stupid shit to keep a machine happy?
I lost the count how many companies made me create dumb tests to achieve some random ass definition of code coverage. Once I was literally trying to save production and had to get back and add a boilerplate test. And somehow this is a standard here in Brazil, everyone loves these “metrics”
https://veloren.net/ is a voxel MMO and it is already very playable
If you are not dealing with a legacy project, windows server is the definition is insanity. Even projects that still use windows server usually use in a VM running on Linux.
Technically you can, but no at least mediocre framework supports it, for the thread context it seems just bike shading
Nick from The Linux Experiment youtube channel made a video recently talking about that, for him and for me it’s clear that this quote:
software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial activity should not be covered by this Regulation
means that any open source that gets any work from paid personnel from a company interested in the project in any commercial activity is covered by the regulation.
Here is the timestamp of his argument, I’m not from EU so I have no idea how this kind of idea could be implemented, but the text seems clear to me and seems bad.
If that is the case projects would be obligated to reject contributions from any companies.
Idk if you know but you van actually save a post or comment pressing the button “save” under it. It will appear in your profile in a section of saved stuff.
Stop lying, who in the modern world would need embedded systems?
You are just stupid and im smart
Just retry is usually a bad ideia, specially that this problem is probably an overload, just adding retries can makes the problem.even worse with the app ddosing the server
I actually prefer
Optional.of(bar)
.map(Bar::baz)
.orElse(null)
You can crucify me but there is no way to miss the point in a quick glance here and I doubt that with JVM optimizations there is any meaningful performance impact, exceptionally in business code.
The other is giving a fuck about users and not only about their vision.
And I know it is their project and they can do whatever they want but it’s my opinion and I dont like it.