The commenter must believe forks are magic.
and like half the [rust] devs left for Crab.
Crablang is a joke fork to make fun of a trademark screw up by the rust foundation.
The commenter must believe forks are magic.
and like half the [rust] devs left for Crab.
Crablang is a joke fork to make fun of a trademark screw up by the rust foundation.
Exactly, you never know when you want to change the base for printing out from under someone.
What unholy mix of languages is that?
It is dominated by a blend of javascript and python, but with notes of something exotic. Maybe algol? or vhdl?, there is to little to tell.
Impressive, someone write up a spec and publish it to the esolang wiki.
The code seems to be C-style language with curly braces and types in front for variable declarations, probably java. This means the variable must be declared of screen before the loop or it would not compile. It could have a previous value or be uninitialized, but that does not affect the end result.
Segmentation fault, you forgot to take the reference and derefenced a null pointer.
Because the only brainfuck instructions in your comment where a - which decrements and 20 +, each of which increments.
Mine echos the first two characters from stdin, because of the commas and dots.


SerenityOS is “a love letter to '90s user interfaces with a custom Unix-like core”.
It’s good enough to be proud of, while alienating normal people, not incidentally, like linux used to, but on purpose, like this sentence does, making it a great for elitists.
Spotify suck at programming. When using the app offline, I can view and play songs and podcasts directly or from the queue, but the menu to add stuff to the queue doesn’t load.


Link because it sometimes doesn’t show up in f-droid:
https://f-droid.org/packages/de.schildbach.oeffi/


They may not have noticed the cameras or not have a choice to go elsewhere in a reasonable time.
Mostly a great comment, but I wouldn’t compare unit to null, it’s more like the void type.
Then rust has ||{}
Sadly we can’t add more complexity without adding an argument:
|_:&'_[()]|{}


We do have one in Germany. While we are searching for suitable long term storage, the barrels are rusting away in salt mines.


Does /dev/null support sharding?
Is there ever an instance when you do want to compare object identity instead of “equal”-ness?
Maybe if you have to check if the object is one you already hold a lock for or account for some similar consequence of questionable architecture.


It’s probably hungry, feed it a mouse.
The actual best thing to do, apart from getting professional help, would probably setting the climate control to the lowest temperature to make the snake slow and sluggish before doing anything else.
Well, if I asking for help, it’s probably because I am wrong about something. So I know who to trust.
Having the sign bit in front, makes them compare like sign-bit-integers and if they are compared/sorted like 2s-complement integers, the negatives are reversed but still come after the positives.
This doesn’t change it to a png, but your image viewers recognize it as webp. You should just associate .wepb with your image viewer in the OS.
Rust doesn’t have a scheduler.
The issue is the false assumption, that the
removeoperation can safely be done without taking a lock. This can be done in some specific data structures using atomic operations, but here the solution was to just take the lock. The same thing could have happened in a C code base but without the unsafe block indicating where to look for the bug.