I vote for naming this branch “mommy”, since all other branches are it’s offspring, and related to it.

I mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.

JavaOS

No 16 gigs is ok for an LLM

On your gpu

I’ve developed “AI” using prolog.

No machine learning, you’re still solving problems using logical reasoning and deduction that’s not intuitively obvious for humans.

Machine learning isn’t the only form of AI.

The logo in the top left corner

The icons in the dock

Try nvim

Where you put it is not my problem.

The general census is that latex actually is an example of programming languages sharing semantics with non programming languages and not being intend as a programming language.

since you linked to wikipedia:

The domain of the language is also worth consideration. Markup languages like XML, HTML, or troff, which define structured data, are not usually considered programming languages.[12][13][14] Programming languages may, however, share the syntax with markup languages if a computational semantics is defined. XSLT, for example, is a Turing complete language entirely using XML syntax.[15][16][17] Moreover, LaTeX, which is mostly used for structuring documents, also contains a Turing complete subset.[18][19]

Programming language

Sometimes even non Turing complete languages are considered a programming language but Turing completeness usually is the criteria agreed upon:

The majority of practical programming languages are Turing complete,[5] and all Turing complete languages can implement the same set of algorithms. ANSI/ISO SQL-92 and Charity are examples of languages that are not Turing complete, yet are often called programming languages.[6][7] However, some authors restrict the term “programming language” to Turing complete languages.[1][8]

SQL is turing complete

This.

Highlight important aspects of the worry with caps

Statistiken belegen immer wieder aufs neue, Arbeitnehmer mit vernünftiger Gewerkschaft verdienen mehr…

Angesehen davon ist das Argument zu sagen “es bekommt eh jeder den ausgehandelten Tarifvertrag” komplett dumm in meinem Augen, dem je mehr Mitglieder die Gewerkschaft hat, desto besser kann diese verhandeln. Nur weil das Ergebnis am Ende für alle angewandt wird heißt es nicht das die Mitgliederzahl keine Rolle spielt.

I don’t understand your intention, as for tips and hints and end you post on this line:

“Ps: if you have a different opinions than I do skip this post”

That’s the perfect recipe for a circle jerk.