UniFi seem to have dabbled with 2.5 GBE briefly and then jumped to 10. I’m guessing that 10 will be the way to go.
You’re looking at cat 6A patch leads rather than 7. 7 requires different but RJ45 compatible connectors, I believe. Yes, I’m still trying to understand what the difference is.
I have a 2.5G router, the CG Max. A 1 G switch (waiting for a reasonably priced 10 G) and a 10 G WAP. It’s a bit of a mess!
Does one good to be challenged (at least) occasionally.
I learned something new.
Up voted
I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up… Really wasn’t expecting that.
Apologies to OP. I don’t know how to reference users: marauding_gibberish142@lemmybdzero
In terms of physical connections you’ve said that the card needs the x4. Not sure what there is to say further.
Can’t get a 30 cm ruler into a 15 cm pencil case.
Maybe I’ve totally misunderstood your post.
I don’t think you do.
A x1 will fit in a x4 but not the other way around.
Thank-you for your eloquence and loquacious reply.
Because I’m being rude and selfish today. It happens occasionally. My dog made me do it. Just before it ate my homework.
Shhhhhhhhh!
Ethics. Police.
In the same post.
I’m not police, but I am in the legal industry. Ethics is talked about a lot. Not seen much.
I think most phones have recording apps.
I have always hated ‘find’ with the non-standard options. Basic RegEx is easy to use and fd became a firm favourite from the off.
Sometimes: a laughing hyena.
If you don’t have tested backups, you don’t have a backup.
that’s unrelated - AES-256 for example can be executed just fine on either a 32- or 64-bit machine. in theory there’s nothing stopping you from running it on an 8-bit or 16-bit CPU (although other considerations related to the size of AES’s lookup tables make this unlikely). from some random googling, here is an implementation of Chacha20, another 256-bit encryption algorithm, for 8-bit microcontrollers.
I started out programming a 6502a in 1980, 680X0 a little later in 87, so I get that bit, but it’s easier doing operations on a larger register. I remember writing code for 8 bit multiplication of 32 bit floating points.
I enjoyed and understood the rest of your prose though. Didn’t do much/any programming/low level after say 2005, and regret it now. Trying to re-learn but things have moved on so much.
I take that there isn’t much motivation in moving to 128 because it’s big enough; it’s only 8 cycles (?) to fill a 512 (that can’t be right?).
Thank-you a lot for that. I wander around the tech blogs like lobsters etc, Reddit and here but never see anything that i remember seeing (if you follow me), but I don’t consciously look.
Encryption lengths are getting long so you’d think it was high time.
Your description sounds like the advent of 32 bits where there was a 16 bit address bus stage.
Whilst other distros move to a Weston (corrections please?) era Intel x86 2013 ish?
Bravo, I think. That’s going to be tough.
On a related track, is there any talk of 128 bit chips in general?
You mean my cosmetic surgeon? I pay on time and go back. What more were you thinking of?
Seriously though, yes. The best thanks is to help them keep the lights on every month.
Here in the UK we were pointlessly getting the clap every Thursday on our doorsteps for the NHS. I may have misunderstood.
If you haven’t tested your backups, you ain’t got a backup.
systemd seems to like mounting stuff on /media. However, I would consult the Linux filesystem hierarchy documents around (eg. Wikipedia and then follow the references) for the most compatible place.
/srv /mnt tend to suggest themselves. /home is for your personal stuff not shared user wide stuff.
Don’t put stuff in local directories, leave it in a NAS location and mount it where you need it using fstab or auto/mount units and the appropriate filesystem. Maybe I’ve misunderstood something you wrote to think of this last bit.
There’s a change detection add-on for Firefox I use for websites which don’t have RSS feeds. Might work on that other thing.
SiteDelta Watch.
Debian Developers are prone to add their own bits with the upstream package. Sometimes it is very useful, sometimes not. They add the relevant systemd units in and turn them on for you and also set up the cron jobs according to which dev prepared the package.
You don’t have to install systemd with Debian (I think?). The row when systemd started to gain traction and DDs debated its inclusion for ages lead to a strange set of decisions, IMHO, about the filesystem layout, which is quite different to what a systemd person would expect, to make it work with the other low level system that is being used.
I thought I saw that sysv stuff is being marked for being removed from the kernel at some stage. Am I imagining that? I don’t know what the alternative init systems are now.
Anyway, Debian is a fine distro.
Suggest you run a desktop with prioritised apt-pinning on Testing and Sid. It makes it semi-rolling and it’s stable as anything. The community makes sure that less than an hour goes past before someone posts a solution to a package error and for that reason I suggest that you always install the apt package scripts which provide the change logs and known bugs with that package before you hit install.
The feedback from the community upstream to the DDs is amazing.
I hope aptitude - an apt TUI - is still being used as that’s one of my favourite ever Debian utilities; a lot of the packages show as hard dependencies when you install them individually but are actually covered by other packages already installed; you can reduce the unused packages in your system by marking the packages auto installed yourself in aptitude very easily. There are several other packages in the repos to do all manner of interesting things. The community spirit is very very strong.
Good luck and have fun.
I found that starting with a debootstrap minimal install from a live distro (I like ArchLinux as a rescue usb, but there are plenty of others on distrowatch.com) and adding a kernel was the best way to go to try to keep the numbers of packages down in my Debian systems. YMMV. My experience was coming up to a decade ago now though, although lots of hardware vendors always love their Debian; UniFi was a Debian fan last time I looked at the controller.