• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle
  • Its less about immedoate profit and more about pumping up gamepass numbers under one umbrella for investors to see a large number increase. Its part of the reason why Xbox Live Gold has been rebranded into Gamepass Core. Microsoft supposedly is under their sub projection (despite having about 40M subs) and trying to pump the numbers as much as possible.

    Overwatch makes no sense given its a feee game. Unless your implying gamepass pays for the battlepass, as the game moving to gamepass would be a detriment on console as it does not require gamepass core to play (as its free)




  • I think its the notion that its a game first device, that also happens to do pc stuff. Like you mention, the lines get blurry as theres always weird exceptions (e.g. xbox having dev mode allowing for unique softeare to be ran, also can technically run microsoft cloud edition if you wanted something computer like, or like the PS3 being able to run “OtherOS” before sony backtracked on allowing PS3 users to run Linux on the device. Would fall under the same kinda distinction that seperates a laptop and a “gaming laptop” drspite it functionally being the same.

    The only differemce is valve tailored SteamOS in a way thats console like, despite its linux internals, almost in the same way that Xbox’s os is a severely stripped down version of Windows but is still windows nonetheless


  • AMD supports ML, its just a lot of smaller projects are made with CUDA backends, and dont have developers there to switch from CUDA to OpenCL or similar.

    Some of the major ML libraries that used to built around CUDA like Tensorflow has already made non CUDA branches, but thats only because tensorflow is open source, ubiquitous in the scene and litterally has google behind it.

    ML for more niche uses basically is in the chicken and egg situation. People wont use other gpus for ML because theres no dev working on non CUDA backends. No ones working on non CUDA backends because the devs end up buying Nvidia, which is basically what Nvidia wants.

    There are a bunch of followers but a lack in of leaders to move the direction in a more open compute environment.










  • Because piracy is often a service problem and not always a price one. If a pirate can offer you a better service, people will pay for it.

    If you only see piracy as a price issue, then it would make sense why you dont understand why people do it.

    Take for example, pretty shitty android boxes preloaded with various kodi streams. Say if you speak a niche language in the U.S for example, and want media in that language, some people would be willing to pay for a (pretty shitty) android tv box that has warez steams of saidncontent because thr legal methods isnt easy to obtain nor have the technological knowlege to properly pirate.