Unlike conventional batteries, supercapacitors have an exceptionally long lifespan, lasting hundreds of thousands of charge-discharge cycles, whereas lithium batteries typically last only five years or less.
So, what’s the conversation rate between charge-discharge cycles and years?
Quickly filtering out a subset of them to prioritize so that we get the most value possible out of the time that humans spend on it.
LLMs cannot:
LLMs can
Semantics aside, they’re very different skills that require different setups to accomplish. Just because counting is an easier task than analysing text for humans, doesn’t mean it’s the same it’s the same for a LLM. You can’t use that as evidence for its inability to do the “harder” tasks.
Sounds to me like a 50% improvement over zero human eyes.
It certainly would be. Thankfully, there’s many more than zero human eyes involved in this.
Considering that it’s a language task, LLMs exist, and the cost, it’s a reasonable assumption. It’d be pretty silly to analyse a bag of words when you have tools you can use with minimal work with much better results. Even sillier to spend over $200 for something that can be run on a decade old machine in a few hours.
Same. I keep thinking back to my time TAing for an intro programming course and getting students who just add random braces until their code compiles. That’s me right now with Rust pointers.
Having come from the world of C++, this was a huge step up.
It wins in the sense that you still have access to the software and code, and you have the option to either hire someone new to maintain it or switch to something else. Closed source proprietary software only leaves you with the latter choice.
An important component of the cost to consider is how long we expect a company to support a piece of software, and how much it would cost to migrate everything when they drop support. FOSS wins in this regard, especially if you can get a support contact with the devs.
Yep. It’s part of their mating ritual. You can learn more about it at c/fuckcars.
Microsoft is working very hard at getting into this data game. Don’t think they won’t try making similar deals.
Are we looking at a future where we need a search engine to tell us which search engine to use for your queries?
If no one can make sense of the change, then you reject it. Makes no difference if it was generated with an LLM or copy-pasted from Stackoverflow.
Or, make it fade more and more for each “unique” visitor. Make sure it hits after they start their marketing campaign.
Reminds me of this story of the wifi that only worked when it rained
The world isn’t going to be uninhabitable within our lifetimes either. Doesn’t mean we don’t have a responsibility towards future generations in making sure we head in the right direction.
Do you think that’s possible to achieve? If all necessary labour can be accomplished by AI, where would this power come from?
This is a problem with the add-on store, not the browser. Do the forks have their own add-on stores? Or do they just use the same one that Mozilla provides? To the best of my knowledge, the only forks that have their own stores are the ones that wouldn’t be able to use Firefox plugins anyway (e.g. Palemoon).
I don’t think forking Firefox is going to change what you see in the add-on store. You would need someone to run their own store. Or just install the plugin manually.
Basically any question you might have can be fed into ChatGPT. You just need to be aware that its output is very often wrong. I would only recommend using on topics that you’re already well versed in so that you can recognize when it’s wrong.
I don’t see the need to ever pay for it. I’m already getting everything I need out of the free model. Never had issues with prioritization. If it’s slow to respond, that’s just more time that I spend thinking about the question myself — something I would be doing regardless.