Similar to Silence, a Signal fork that worked over SMS that I used to use. Glad to see the idea is still alive.

Unless you desperately need to free up room in your tiny SSD to make room for Baldur’s Gate 3. I recently used a tool like this to get rid of a bunch of old logs and things and managed to free up tens of gigabytes of precious space.

https://voiceinput.futo.org/

I use it and it works very well.

What is broken that it needs to be updated to fix? I use it every day and it works fine.

Yes, the generic names make it a nightmare to search for things relating to them.

We are here.

Okay but this is literally the racist usage of the word.

They’re not the only ones calling y’all out. Stop defending using racist terms.

I was also very disappointed that the users there voted against the change. The name has a bad history, and there’s no better time to change a community name than when you make a move to a new platform.

This isn’t neatly as big of a change, though. I don’t think a poll should be needed. The mods should just take a stance against racism and enforce that the term not be used.

“Polished,” “tweaked,” or if we want to reclaim a term from the crafters, “bedazzled.”

Thank you for making this post. The number of times I’ve seen the term used here lately has been bothering me.

It’s also racist in car culture.

No, I’m not. I’m saying that downloading from F-Droid is perfectly safe, as they verify all updates before putting them on the repo.

At least where I am, they are pushed based on which cell tower you are connected to. My old phone did not even have functional GPS and I still got emergency alerts.

Have you ever used Github? People can’t just push code to the main repo.

And all submissions to F-Droid are checked for this kind of thing.

For any app that isn’t network-facing and that works with protocols that haven’t been changed in a long time, there is no point worrying over how “active” the development is on an app. If nothing has been broken, then nothing needs fixing. My music player has had all the features it needs for a decade, and continues to work to this day. Why change a good thing?

The conversion losses to feed animals is very high. It takes 76% less land for us to subsist on plants rather than to eat meat. Well, actually, that’s the world average, it might be even higher in the US because of its higher meat consumption. I should check the study again.

It takes 76% less land for us to just eat plants, rather than to grow them to feed to animals that we then in turn eat. Really amazing how inefficient it is.

The original article does specify contiguous US.

Time for Ban 2!