

If NotDrunk: GiveBooze(“*”) Else: GiveBooze(“water”)
Edit:Formatting is jumbled. Can’t be arsed to fix it
If NotDrunk: GiveBooze(“*”) Else: GiveBooze(“water”)
Edit:Formatting is jumbled. Can’t be arsed to fix it
Eventually nobody.
Capitalism isn’t about sustainability, it’s about making the most amount of profit in the shortest amount of time.
Eventuall you bleed everyone dry and nobody has a job. But for a short amount of time the shareholders will have had a huge number of 0’s and 1’s in a database somewhere equating to their “worth”
Proton has stopped the “visionary” that allows SMTP, now it’s only available in business accounts. :( I tried setting up the bridge CLI, but so far haven’t been able to get it to send anything after logging in and syncing the account, Maybe I’ll try again once I’ve got some things off my plate.
Setup rules that forward to an IP:port I used a guide on smarthomebeginner initially. I’ll try and find it found it.
Go here https://www.smarthomebeginner.com/traefik-docker-compose-guide-2022/
And scroll till the section. “Adding non-docker or external apps behind Traefik”
Jack and charger ports can be controlled by the phone to turn off if there is low resistance (ie water) between contacts.
A battery is harder, as it’s what provides the power to the thing that decides whether to turn off the port. Not that it’s impossible to put some smarts into a battery, to decide when to power the output. But it’s going to add a lot of complexity and bulk to do it (switching circuit, logic circuits, etc)
I see it as a longevity thing.
Sure you can bring another battery pack with you and charge your device from it, but at some point your internal battery will be degraded enough that it essentially needs to be plugged in to function, which is not feasible.
Being able to easily replace the thing in the device that wears out fastest is a good thing.
Granted I expect if this does go through, that mfg will make the battery hard to replace by other means (ie drm locks) making sure they can nickel and dime the consumer all the way.
Correcting the reviewer.
Notes: “should of” isn’t valid, should implies a verb, of isn’t a verb. I expect you meant “should have”. Please recall this in future submissions.