

Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.


Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.


Looking forward to comment.
What about Android? What’s alternative?


I donate to NetBSD foundation


Postopen probably won’t save it. There are ways to create even more copyleft license but that would mean create everything from scratch. Like compilers to everytool but no one will use that other than who wants complete copyleft works. Not even Linux can use that tools. But no one wants that lol


True. Also hope that Arcane and other non Linux specific stuff gets more attention


Wow. I also prefer BSD or ISC but why would korea jail people for using GPL!


We need more FOSSified hardwares in market


Author confirmed somewhere else that 1 euro option sold out apparantly now there’s 2 euro option.
I am using https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=vopo.easyhomefinance
It was open source but can’t find source now


The NetBSD Foundation can use some funding from Community.
Nice timing as 4.20 is released
Ada is good name for girl child
License’s focus is not vibe coding devs but in general FOSS devs but current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work. This one I wish will protect their works against non FOSS LLM/A.I. models leeching their work.