Expert developer, Buddhist

  • 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • Well, I took the time to read the whitepaper, and it’s yeah, pretty dumb sounding. The gist is that it’s p2p post sharing with lots of captchas & a crypto edge that it probably doesn’t need https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/eb02f20b-e787-4a02-b188-d0fcbc250ba1/pleb.tex-6d2e1bf.pdf

    The similarities to Lemmy are substantial, it’s just not on activitypub, but rather its own pubsub thing. If you want to host data, you still have to keep a node running at all times, it’s not the case that “there are no instances”. Those instances can moderate the content, so it’s not the case that “there’s no moderation.” The whitepaper mentions that “its possible to delegate running a client to a centralized server…” rather than having to have a fat syncing client running on your own machine … in lemmy, it’s more like “its possible to run your own node if you want”. Plebbit doesn’t care about maintaining history of posts, it expects that servers will go down over time, and the data will be lost. Lemmy is pretty similar in that regard too, if all instances hosting the data go down, then it’s lost. The expected outcome is that there’s a handful of big nodes, as is the typical result of this form of “decentralization” - same as Lemmy, Email

    Ultimately, I don’t see Plebbit doing anything particularly smarter/better, and having private/public key cryptography involved doesn’t really matter. They talk about blockchains and using coins as anti-spam mechanisms, but I don’t see why that’s relevant to the implementation



















  • Lung@lemmy.worldtoOpen Source@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My “user directories”? You mean you have more than one $HOME with dotfiles in it?

    It was never a problem to find user specific app data on unix. And XDG obviously didn’t solve it because solutions that require everyone to change their code are dumb. Case in point, this thread


  • Lung@lemmy.worldtoOpen Source@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    XDG config was always a smooth brain idea, and any other outcome of this experiment was always ~impossible (of course some apps didn’t switch …)

    Great job to X Desktop Group “fixing” what didn’t need fixing, and causing us to go from one unified system that made sense, to two. And now people don’t even want to use X anymore