What would possibly be the consequences for either parent or child if they violate?

If the law designed is any good, there should be none. The responsibility to check whether the parent has agreed should be laid on the social media giants, not the child or the parent. It should be a tool for parents to control the social media consumption of their kids. And after reading the article, which I highly recommend, it seems to be the case:

The broad law comes with heavy burdens for online platforms. It requires basically any digital services provider that collects an email at sign-up to conduct age verification to identify all minors, verify parents or guardians connected to all minors identified, and secure parental consent for a wide range of account activity.

Please read the articles that you post. Asking followup questions that are already answered is a little stupid.

Good b… Oh wait, we need more useful bots on Lemmy

What’s the benefit of doing this apart from a technical challenge and fun? Such a server wouldn’t support the network in any way, right?

Interesting, I wonder how does decentralized nature of fetching data from other instances affect this. Thanks for providing the reference! Will look into it.

It’s important for resiliency, but I’m afraid that many communities will loose a lot of value when they don’t agree on a place to go

There have been some privacy concerns regarding Lenny’s implementation (deleted posts and whatnot). Which has kept some users second-guessing the change. I have tried aether before coming here, but sadly, there are not enough people there.

I just hope that the community from Reddit doesn’t spread itself out too much :(