highly scalled person
You might be on to something, it might have been the lizzard people!
Dann kann ich ja auch einfach sowas wie 017612345678 oder so nehmen
Ist die Antwort bei mir beim falschen Kommentar gelandet, ging doch um Protonmail, nicht BitWarden?
Bin mit Floris board recht happy, habe aber auch nicht wirklich viele spezielle Ansprüche an Keyboards (auch wenns einige coole Funktionen wie undo/redo, clipboard history hat).
Well I ain’t just gonna repeat it…
Nah, TCP is still just kicking the box over, but just kicking it over again, if the reciever doesn’t kick back a box saying they got it.
Gutscheine kann man auch nicht mehr ohne account einlösen.
Die wichtigste Sicherheitsmaßnahme war, dass ab den Siebzigern die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen schrittweise gesenkt wurden. 2018 haben wir als letzten Schritt die Senkung von 50 auf 40 km/h auf alle Hauptstraßen ausgeweitet und in den übrigen Straßen von 40 auf 30 km/h.
Try (100,100,100,100,100,101) or 50 ones and a two, should result in 102 and 4 as a max respectively. I tried using less numbers, but the less numbers you use, the higher the values (to be exact less off a deviation(%-difference) between the values, resulting in higher numbers) have to be and wolframAlpha does not like 10^100 values so I stopped trying.
thanks for looking it up:).
I do think the upper bound on that page is wrong thought. Incedentally in the article itself only the lower bound is prooven, but in its sources this paper prooves what I did in my comment before as well:
for the upper bound it has max +log(n) . (Section 2, eq 4) This lets us construct an example (see reply to your other comment) to disproove the notion about beeing able to calculate the max for many integers.
to be fair it does seem to work for any two numbers where one is >1. As lim x,y–> inf ln(ex+ey) <= lim x,y --> inf ln(2 e^(max(x,y))) = max(x,y) + ln(2).
I think is cool because works for any number of variables
using the same proof as before we can see that: lim,x_i -->inf ln(sum_i/in I} e^(x_i)) <= ln(.
So it would only work for at most [base of your log, so e<3 for ln] variables.
so 0.3 ~= 1-ln(2)=max(1-ln(2),1-ln(2)) = floor(ln(2*e^(1-ln(2)))) = floor(ln(2)+(1-ln(2))) = 1 ?
That would bee engeneer 2, not Mathematician3 xD.
Just out of curiostity, what was you Idea behind that?
haben sie, ich habe das in der Serie mal aufgeschnappt glaube ich.
trainee on the job meine ich (also auszubildende)
der Link (und der unten auf der Seite) ist doch https://feddit.de/modlog . Lädt der bei dir? Ich bekomme da nur eine einzeilige html-seite, auf der “Server error” steht.
Beitrag existiert bereits: https://slrpnk.net/post/2585479
I totally agree that christians (or any religion/religion-like structure) can be and in the case of Christianity often is just as bad.
it’s responding to someone claiming islam is worse that’s not how I read the comment. I read it as in this case it would make sense to assume the attackers were muslims. My response was intended to say that in this exact case that would probably be a reasonable assumption.
I want to make it clear that I do not think that it is generally significantly more likely for the islam faith to cause queerphobia than it would be for any other one. It is just that in this particular region (Berlin-Neukölln) and demographic (young men) that would be the most likely perputrators.
yes but if you read the article linked in the reddit theread anouther comment mentioned this was in Berlin-Neukölln, which is predominantly muslim and known to have issues with (esp. young men/boys) radicals opposing queer people.
Gibt auf Kleinanzeigen doch oft welche fün fuffi bis zu Verschenken.