oo1

We have a problem with testing.

“Management” identifies problem “testing” adds word “lead”.

Issues job advert, recruits, problem solved?

. . . third “testing lead” in 2 years . . . “it’s so hard to recruit”

you’d have to encrypt your messages, and manage who has the keys for it to be private.

Someone tried “April & Bob” once, but MS excel converted it to date.

yeah all I thought maybe people with a catheter.
Or they’re fish or something.

stackoverflow vs posting a meme.

Which one gets the best help?

I can see the appeal of the meme option.

commie
/s

I agree this looks trolly. but to add

FOSS also has benefits to b2b customers ,
It gives them supply chain indepence / resilience avoids “vendor lock in” or a million ways to say it…

It’s a similar benefit to using standardised physical parts in place of something bespoke.

Even if i’m paying a large tech company for a service, i’d want them using and developing foss so that i can theoretically switch supplier more easily. sure ther’s probably some proprietary data, but not necessarily propritary code/software tools.

Of course some b2b cusomers seem to really enjoy paying MS and oracle etc. to bend them over a barrel. . .

-y

does it need cell-data? why? that surprises me; but then again maybe not . . .

The format doesn’t bother me too much.
json can be great for sure.

But I reckon some people could still bung a load of unnecessarily complex layout and aesthetic data in there, and potentially screw up the data structure and still make it harder to access than need be.

I accept that, if the json is structured logically, it should handle both substantive and layout data, and probably easiest to get to either the content or the formatting.

yeah, substance > style.

the content/facts/information is what should matter, make it accessible. share it.

let the audience access it however best suits them.