I’m wondering the exact same thing

This is a nice overview: CLPFD and CLPZ: Prolog Integer Arithmetic

mother can be used in several ways. If both X and Y variables are uninitialized, then it looks for all mother relationships. If one of them is initialized, it looks for matching relationships. If both are initialized, it returns true if such a relationship exists.

Depends on how you want to define your domain knowledge.

The thing you need to define for sure is the predicate mother/2 (Which has arity 2, or in other words, two arguments). From then on, multiple options are available:

1. Take mother(X, Y) as an “axiom”, and define mother terms for all elements:

mother(abel, eve).
mother(isaac, sarah).

2. Derive mother(X, Y) from female(X) and parent(X, Y) terms.

mother(X, Y) :- 
  parent(X, Y), 
  female(Y).

3. Smash the institutional gender power structures and define only parent/2 terms instead of mother/2 and father/2.

Brilliant!

I can confirm it’s Catppuccin Mocha. I am not currently aware of the background color issue, but I’ll look into the matter soon. Thanks for letting me know. Also how dare you. But thanks.

Catppuccin

Point taken, but Big Tech systematically does equally bad things while disguising them behind DevRel, so I think it’s justified to poke fun at that.

Just curious, what would be a correct translation?

The joke is that it’s hard to tell if this is a joke because the lines between good intentions, corporate jargon, and feasibility have been blurred beyond recognition both here and in the real world.

It’s also funny that after all these years, i18n is still a mess. Moreover, even if translations are standard in GUIs and documentation, for some reason, everyone is okay with defaulting to English for the oldest form of computer interaction.

Also, the joke is whatever you want it to be. Follow your dreams.

Both are incomplete, but the article is no longer paywalled

Looks like you sshd into my working titles

lol thank you

where do you get those numbers, boss?

why keep going when the objective

LOL!

Yes, all is good (or is it?)

I beg you pardon?

don’t kink shame

Good point. I actually thing that having if x == true is bad practice anyway because it’s redundant, so showing a toggle in that context would have the benefit of highlighting that something’s wrong.

fwiw I opened an issue on the vs code repo. It already got a downvote and the issue was reassigned from one maintainer to another. Popcorn is tightly secured.