This is the big limitation for all fast charging claims. EV battery packs are already very thermally constrained. Faster charging will require more active cooling, which means lower pack density due to the added coolant, compressors and radiators. There is no free lunch here. Even the mythical solid state batteries are going to have the same thermal limitations on charging without some breakthrough in portable cryogenics or high temp superconductors.
I’ve run searches over 60k lines of raw JSON on a 2015 MacBook air without any problems.
NSFW is the only one that makes sense tbh. Reddit’s interface would actually be pretty good for an OF like subscription service considering how much OF advertising already exists.
But I strongly suspect they are going to try to do something dumb like tech support or tutoring which nobody is going to pay for.
Most people don’t actually like real security as much as they claim they do. SELinux and its derivatives are pretty much the only real option we have for properly robust security these days.
The reality is that a certain portion of people will never believe that an AI can be self aware no matter how advanced they get. There are a lot of interesting philosophical questiona here, and the hard skeptics are punting just as much as the true believers in this case.
It’s honestly kind of sad to see how much reactionary anti-tech sentiment there is in this tech enthusiast community.
A skightly different view, but when I started a lot of companies did give back. I have worked with, hired, managed and led at least a half dozen teams with the explicit mission to make an already existing open source project do what we want by contributing functionality upstream, or by forking the project. I actually wrote a “open source engineering management” curriculum back when I was still teaching.
Unfortunately these efforts often sttuggle in a similar way - some developer who is not affiliated with us starts creating friction, and blowing up internal schedules, sometimes seemingly on purpose. Management starts to ask why so many of our features are dependent on SkankTopia6969 approving PRs and awkward conversations ensue. And then the project slowly becomes the process of educating an increasingly detached internal hierarchy on the realities of open source development, and people inevitability start asking why this is even in-house tooling in the first place.
Despite that, I’ve fielded a bunch of products like this, though always at fairly small scale (like $10M/yr revenue). The only time I’ve really done it big league the project got canned during a technical reorg.
Best i can imagine, this is what happens if you are terrified of smart pointers, but also want to make all object pointers scope specific. So at every layer of hierarchy, you have a unique reference to some partial implementation above and below it.
Honestly I struggle to imagine any real scenario where this would make sense… except maybe like some kind of insane recursive factory.
Gen Z was a mistake
Are they really using the term “reskeet?”
It certainly paints a very specific mental image.
Remember voat?
If elected president my first order of business will be to make all birth certificates fully unicode compatible.
Ok, that was always allowed!
Bullshit. Most men suffer under toxic patriarchy as well. I absolutely love that this shit is finally getting pulled into the spotlight. I have not suffered a single iota of harm from anything “woke” and I would argue that no honest man has either.
This is why we only hire competent engineers.
Right, the entire issue is that it basically acts as a massive layer of insulation between reality and bad management. The whole thing is like a fucking paradox - any time you make a change to workflows or procedures there’s this stupid period where you need to “wait for buy in” where it doesn’t matter how outwardly idiotic the change is, you can’t actually call it obviously fucking stupid for like several weeks, or you are seen as being contrarian, or causing trouble. And the real bullshit is that the “better” the tools are, the more this effect is amplified. So as an engineer, I have paradoxically come to appreciate bad management tools simply because when someone does something stupid with them, I can call it out more easily.
The issue is more that all of these planning tools enable bad managers to implement bad management practices and workflows without any actual tracking for what constitutes bad management. Almost without fail, every manager I’ve worked with who is very attached to these products ends up using them for the sake of using them. And then when that produces shit results it’s all about “engineering buy in” and “process learning curves” and they end up doing real damage to products before someone notices that Jira actions are not correlated with protective management.
The biggest issue is that good, effective management tools actually end up being a double edged sword because of how they shield bad managers the illusion of legitimacy.
Be the operator overload you wish to see in the world
I think this is a European thing. “IT” is a general term for any tech work, whereas in the US that term refers to technician level network infrastructure and sysadmin work.