If only haskell devs were writing documentations, instead of going “type sigs is all the documentation you need!”

There is no good programming language, even including the ones people do not use.

Is OCaml going mainstream, hm

Lisp has always been the future >.>

I heard this is why some people do ocaml instead

What years of dynamic typing brainrot does to mf

Yeah, like replacing individual braincells with more durable mechanisms. Idk, maybe they would be cellular as well. …that makes me wonder, maybe it is possible to transfer consciousness even with traditional biological mechanism?

1. It at least feels slightly little bit like lisp.
2. Shit I’m f*ed

… ah right, it runs on any browser. Lame

I disagree with this recommendation, the maintainer closed a breaking issue (default syntax highlighting breaks on clean install) saying “workaround exists”. That’s a red flag ime.

Eww, leetcode

I do have one notion where we can have edge over. Human brain is quite optimized in energy usage, as a consequence of natural selection. Meanwhile, IIRC computers are optimized for speed, and so it often wastes energy. Now let’s see where this goes - will they be able to operate without gushing in energy?

And there’s haskell compiler

Ah, me too. Should have specified OpenAI

Basically any pro-AI argument seems to go “it will achieve AGI”. So funny that lots of people buy that, forgetting how hard a general intelligence is.

Maybe the real “AI nuking the world” scenario was that it ie caused by the faulty information the AI hallucinated into existence