snooggums

I stuck on rule 14 or so where you have to know the country based on street maps, but did have to look up today’s wordle (rule 12?) since I don’t play that.

More like Bing of Awful IT Practices!

I’ve added this comment effort to my time tracker in story points.

I thought the whole “clippy just wanted to help” meme was sarcastic since clippy’s nagging was just as intrusive as the current AI being forced into everything, but it seems it is not.

Letting Clippy Jr write your code.

They knew the two lines that I quoted would clue in most people who dislike vibe coding that it was a joke.

AmidFuror’s description is on point and I see it as a variant of Poe’s Law. Instead of sarcasm being mistaken for a real belief, it is presenting a fictional account of someone being self aware that is mistaken for someone actually becoming self aware.

There are two lines that make me absolutely certain it is written by someone who it not a vibe coder and is leaning into the sarcasm.

• ‘pulling out my wallet for someone that knows what they are doing’ implies the poster knows they don’t know what they are doing
• ‘vibe coding is just roleplaying for guys who want to feel like hackers’ is a joke I’ve seen directed at vibe coders more than once

Keep in mind that not all deception is malicious, but most people see the word deception as having a negative implication. An actor/actress pretending to be someone else is technically deceptive the same way as whoever wrote this hilarious post. They are presenting a fictional account for an audience.

No, the phrasing makes it clear someone wrote a fictional account of becoming self aware that the output of vibe coding isn’t maintainable as it scales.

It says valid but obsolete, which sounds like a contradiction to me.

This is technically valid but considered obsolete. RFC 822 allowed domains without dots, but RFC 2822 made this obsolete.

Do email suffix not indicate a different domain like .org and .com for websites?

I haven’t memorized everything, so file folders grouped together is easier.

Having the option to choose to sort either way would be the best option.

Well, they could still see in black and white…

Some of the bullet points are outright wrong.

Some of the bullet points are misleading.

The reader would have been better off with the initial list.

We reached that part a long time ago.

When the technical side reaches a certain level of security, the humans become the weakest link.

Time to charge up the old butt plug and revisit Hello World!

You are thinking of the one they used to design the common keyboard layout, Qwertycoatl.

Psychopatl

It is just a format for the joke, like a web comic or video of a skit.

False logic errors created by the AI while asking it to solve real world logic errors?

Not even a new thing either. Barely any jobs are done because people want to do specific types of work, and those jobs tend to be severely underpaid (teaching, social services).

People didn’t flock to factories in the 60s and 70s because they wanted to work in a factory, they wanted the pay and benefits. Same for office work today.

Acting like the entire history of the philosophy of knowledge is just some attempt make “knowing” seem more nuanced is extremely arrogant.

That is not what I said. In fact, it is the opposite of what I said.

I said that treating the discussion of LLMs as a philosophical one is giving ‘knowing’ in the discussion of LLMs more nuance than it deserves.