But not the one you need. When she notices a smell it’s already too late.

Remember that cache goes stale

All refs load into ChRome.

Close, but it is not narcissism.

The debate has to be made what makes people so unhappy that they have to eat as compensation and how to change it.

In which way? Downvoters don’t see your point.

You could think of Xi as a monarch.

You joke but with chatGPT it’s inevitable. Old school programmers will stick to source code but tools for non-programmers will collect plain text descriptions to create functionality.

Inevitably, images and all other media will become part of it.

Future developers will have to navigate those collections and wonder why a functionality doesn’t work when they remove some side-tracking Instagram stories. They will shrug, leave them in place and heap on further memes and comments until they complete their jira ticket.

You have two rhetorical questions. You must know that competition ceases within an oligarchy and that my point was to argue for competition and not oligarchy.

Thanks for the exchange.

In which housing market without limited supply do prices balloon?

Do you expect me to believe that competition doesn’t work at all? We started this discussion with reduced wages due to increased competition among workers.

Do you want to introduce socialism to prevent competition entirely?

The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop.

But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead.

Those problems don’t help to fix the import problem.

Housing, healthcare, insurance - it is expensive because there is not enough competition - or socialism.

Mark Cuban’s pharmacy changes the market. In the same way, somebody could organize resources and create broad competition for all housing and healthcare markets.

You are sure that I don’t know enough. How do you know that your knowledge about economy is enough or whom to trust to run socialism?

Money is not fake in international trade. Resources can be delivered to other countries.

And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it’s important to know which internal decisions could have led to success.

Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas?

Yes, let’s also outsource the revolution.

Will China take over America? If not, why would China change the economic system in the West? Without the petrodollar, there should just be significantly less resources available.

Was that enough to turn the country into a net importer? I thought the general mismanagement was the bigger problem.

Cake is a present where everybody gets a slice because the cake was selected accordingly.

If only one person can get promoted, or an increased budget for wages is available, could that be resolved without managers, not just in theory but all over the world?

People value things. In capitalism, the ones who value them the most, and who are able to pay, get them.

If you disrupt this mechanism by allocating resources differently, you risk that resources are wasted. Of course you can use other allocations but is that a good idea?

Capitalism has many flaws, e. g. monopolies disrupt this mechanism, but it just has to be better than its competitors to survive.

You imagine taking over capitalism and allocating luxeries differently. I doubt that those luxeries will exist. If workers only want to work e.g. 8 hours per week, because socialism, the surplus will be gone.

If you can make those workers work more under socialism without a gun to their head, then you should be able to do so right now within the legal framework of a coop.

It should be easier because you only have to manage production processes without fighting a war.

Sidequestion: how does a member of the bourgeoisie without capital look like?

You will have to bootstrap it.

How was agriculture sabotaged?