Using Docker in a VM on a Hypervisor is industry standard, using docker inside of docker may be okay for CI purposes but I wouldn’t do anything more than that in production if it’s not necessary.
The stack from the image above (Windows>WSL> Docker>Minikube>Docker>App) is something you’d use on a dev machine (not a “real”, production-like test environment), in which case you don’t really care about the performance loss
That’s the most reasonable part of the image
Does anyone know about a speedtest that’s like iperf but multicore and suited for >100GbE? I’ve seen Patrick from STH use something that could do like 400GbE but I haven’t found out what it’s called
I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense
Well it’s infinite so it has to I guess
What about “The ZipoApps of gTLDs”?
Didn’t know that, thanks. Luckily, I’ve only ever used fd00::/8
Source btw: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_local_address#Definition
fc00::/7 are ULA (basically what RFC1918 was for IPv4) not entirely true, fc00::/8 is part of ULA, but it is not yet defined. Use fd00::/8 instead.
2001:db8::/32 is for documentation purposes
Außerdem gab es sinnvolle evolution, beispielsweise mit WPs die auf Propan basieren, oder die die Abwärme vom Kompressor zum enteisen nutzen
i feel like it’s okay that they do this, but i don’t like the term “source available”. maybe something like “Free for Non-Commercial Use” or “FOSS-NC”?
Bold of you to assume you’ll find an actual human journalism product
That guy was talking about grayjay, a Client to follow creators on multiple platforms at the same time. Grayjay isn’t licensed under AGPL, but instead it uses the FUTO Temporary License. It technically still counts as source available, but I think the NC-Part is okay to have. AGPL would be nicer though especially bc of this.
Germany has a fund like that, GNOME just recently got a grant of about 1M Euros to improve features and provide better accessibility
The only thing I can see in their License that would make it non-free is the non-commercial redistribution part of it, which is not that bad
Und viele davon haben sich jetzt einen account auf einer anderen Instanz gemacht und es läuft weiter. Das ist ja das schöne: wenn eine Instanz ausfällt migrierst du einfach weg und änderst das Lesezeichen in deinem Browser. Raider heißt jetzt Twix und so.
Bei Feddit ist es sogar noch ganz gut, da nur das standard Frontend nicht funktioniert. 3rd Party Clients laufen weiter.
Was ich damit sagen will: komm zu tchncs, oder auch nicht wenn du nicht willst. Deine Instanz läuft ja schon, ist jetzt auch egal.
That list is either the undo-menu or the layers themselves, as everything you do in GIMP is somewhat destructive. This behavior will be changed in GIMP 3 tho.
Can ya please go back to the Drop-Down thingy for your license? It’s already annoying on its own, but it gets even more so when Voyager adds the Link-Preview
is “step in and help review a few PRs” really that helpful? like… oh great, now this one person that i don’t trust is telling me that the other person that i don’t trust made some code that i should merge
Fuck GitLab, all my homies use Codeberg