

Podman pods (or quadlets) managed by ansible.


Podman pods (or quadlets) managed by ansible.


I suggest using llama.cpp instead of ollama, you can easily squeeze +10% in inference speed and other memory optimizations from llama.cpp. With hardware prices nowadays I think every % saved on resources matters. Here is a simple ansible role to setup llama.cpp, it should give you a good idea of how to deploy it.
A dedicated inference rig is not gonna be cheap. What I did, since I need a gaming rig; is getting 32GB DDR5 (this was before the current RAMpocalypse, if I had known I would have bought 64) and an AMD 9070 (16GB VRAM - again if I had known how crazy prices would get I’d probably ahve bought a 24GB VRAM card). The home server runs the usual/non-AI stuff, and llamacpp runs on the gaming desktop (the home server just has a proxy to it). Yeah the gaming desktop has to be powered up when I want to run inference, this is my main desktop so it’s powered on most of the time, no big deal


Most applications/services offer mail as notification channel. Even old school unix utilities such as cron support sending mail (through the system MTA). I use msmtp. Then configure K-9 mail or any decent mail client on your phone, setup filters so that mail from your services ends up in a high priority folder in your mailbox with notifications enabled.
I want to be able to receive notifications both on mobile and desktop, this is the only reasonable option I found and have been running with it for > 10 years.


unattended-upgrades

It can protect APIs as much as any other URL. Or more simply you could disallow any unauthenticated API access in gitea or at the reverse proxy level?
cannot protect against bot traffic coming from many different residential proxies
It can block anything that doesn’t pass the proof-of-work/JS challenge. Most bots don’t interpret JS.


The scraping/bandwidth abuse problem can easily be worked around.
But there still are actual good reasons to not host a public forge.
For example, as long as pull requests are allowed (which is required for actual contributors), anyone can abuse the PR feature to fork your repository, then start pushing random shit into their fork (since the fork is an actual separate git repository).
Bad actors can do it on github all they want, it’s not my storage, not my server used to host potentially illegal content.
Self-hosting public services where you are the only authenticated user and sole publisher of content is easy (using your public forge as a mirror with account creation disabled is fine), hosting other’s people content is another can of worms. Think twice before you do that.


The blurb is my own submission, since it was not so evident how the article was related to self-hosting. I am not the author of the blog post. I am a maintainer of awesome-selfhosted.




Fair enough.
I decided against web/network-based password managers for my personal needs since the additional attack surface is a concern. A Keepass database file synced across machines strikes a good balance for me (requires password + keyfile to open). It’s also simple to backup and protect.
So yeah, for you use case, I’d recommend Aegis Authenticator.


No, I’m not interested in a password manager, thank you
Ok. But since you already use a password manager (right?), why not use its built-in TOTP management. Why do you need yet-another-separate app?
If I really had to, I’d recommend Aegis.
But I’ll still recommend using a password manager (I use KeepassXC on desktop and KeepassDX on Android).


As for the prices… well the rig I bought for ~1500€ in september is now up to ~2200€ (once-in-a-decade investment). It’s not a beast but it works, the primary use case was general computing and gaming, I’m glad it works for local AI, but costs for a dedicated, performant AI rig are ridiculously high right now. It’s not economically competitive yet against commercial LLM services for complex tasks, but that’s not the point. Check https://old.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/ (yeah reddit I know). 10k€ of hardware to run ~200-300B models, not counting electricity bills
Any recommendations for a good XMPP web client?
See my requirements in other comment.
I’m in the same boat, running a Gitlab Mattermost instance for a small team.
Gitlab has not announced yet what will happen with the bundled Mattermost, but I guess it will be dropped entirely, or be hit by the new limitations (what will hit us the hardest is the 10000-most-recent messages limitation, anything further than that will be hidden behind a paywall - including messages sent before the new limitations come in effect - borderline ransomware if you ask me)
I know there are forks that remove the limitation, may end up doing that if the migration path is not too rough.
I used to run a Rocket.Chat instance for another org, became open-core bullshit as well. I’m done with this stuff.
I have a small, non-federated personal Matrix + Element instance that barely gets any use (but allows me to get a feeling of what it can do) - I don’t like it one bit. The tech stack is weird, the Element frontend receives constant updates/new releases that are painful to keep up with, and more importantly, UX is confusing and bad.
So I think I’ll end up switching this one for a XMPP server. Haven’t decided which one or which components around it precisely. I used to run prosody with thick clients a whiiille ago and it was OK. Nextcloud Talk might also work.
My needs are simple, group channels, 1-to-1 chat, posting files to a channel. ideally temporary many-to-many chats, decent web UI.
Voice capabilities would be a bonus (I run and use a mumble server and it absolutely rules once you’ve configured the client, but it doesn’t integrate properly into anything else, and no web UI), as well as some kind of integration with my Jitsi Meet instance. E2E encryption nice but not mandatory. Semi-decent mobile clients would be nice.
For now, wait and see.


unattended-upgrades doesn’t do that unless you explicitly specify Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot "true"; in the config. Check /usr/share/doc/unattended-upgrades/README.md.gz
The main configuration file is /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades, maybe you put your config in the wrong place?
here is mine
I use firewalld as generic firewall and fail2ban as IPS/anti-bruteforce solution (blocks IPs using firewalld’s ipsets)
I have copied the latest git revision c67b943aa894b90103c4752ac430958886b996b2 from https://gitlab.tt-rss.org/tt-rss/tt-rss to my gitea instance which is mirrored to https://gitlab.com/nodiscc/tt-rss and https://github.com/nodiscc/tt-rss.
I don’t intend to make changes or bugfixes (it’s working fine), but I will try to keep it compatible with the PHP version in Debian stable, since I’ve been using it for years and would really like to keep doing so.


A full-blown samba domain is extremely overkill if you don’t have a fleet of windows machines.
You can get centralized user management with a simple LDAP server or similar, no need for a domain.
Also, snapshots-based backups have limited uses (can’t easily restore only a single file, eats quite a bit of storage). The only times where I actually needed backups were because I fucked up a single application or database, don’t want to rollback the whole OS/data drive for that.
https://lemmy.world/post/34029848/18647964
Hypervisor: Debian stable + libvirt or PVE if you need clustering/HA VMs: Debian stable podman if you need containerization below that
You can migrate VMs live between hosts (it’s a bit more work if you pick libvirt, but the overhead/features or proxmox are sometimes overkill, libvirt is a bit more barebones, each has its uses), have a cluster-wide L2 network, use a machine as backup storage for others… use VM snapshots for rollback, etc. Regardless of containerization/orchestration below that, a full hypervisor is still nice to have.
I deploy my services directly to the VM or as podman containers in said VMs. I use ansible for all automation/provisioning (though there are still a few basic provisioning/management to bootstrap new VMs, if it works it works)
deleted by creator