Doesn’t actually say that 60k overheated his drive. He says that he ran a run on 60k, and that he couldn’t do the whole database due to overheating. Two unrelated statements except that 60k is the lower bound for what he could process.

Doesn’t mean he knows what he’s doing though, as pretty huge datasets are processable on quite modest hardware if you do it right.

as it’s spelled: im gur.

“I’m gur”?

Tony… Is that you?

Well the alternative was too heinous to consider.

Yes. Yes it is.

If they brought out new features and charged for those I think most would understand. However since the V2 they basically done nothing in R&D. That’s 6-7 years ago.

I’d rather they found a business model that made them stable, rather than exploiting their current customers. Fact is, if they go bust then there’s à bunch of people left high and dry.

Me too. It also handled some situations, like divergent lines in the same branch or obsolete changes, much better.

It’s a text editor you customise by programming it. Why do you think that’s appealing?

No

Python doesn’t have casts and is strongly typed.

A lot do. They call them “rationals”.

Neural net evaluation mainly, but FP16 is used in graphics too.

My comment is more about how we have this decentralised tool, but we’re unable to get our collective heads out of the centralised model. We e ended up turning it back into centralised VCS.

Ah… Git.

The decentralised version control system.

Soft forks try to maintain code compatible so changes can apply to both code bases. Normally done when there’s hope of a future merging of the code lines. They rarely work, as eventually thing get hard.

Migration is seamless. Uninstall one binary and install the other.

The standard library is where project go to die.

Computer programming, regardless of language, is hard. The computer does exactly what you tell it to.

…and people worry about the name of a git branch.

Is that an armadillo? Forgetting how my own code works is my forte.