gnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoSloupinfosec.pubimagemessage-square93linkfedilinkarrow-up1606arrow-down140
arrow-up1566arrow-down1imageSloupinfosec.pubgnufuu@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square93linkfedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·1 day agoThey didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·24 hours agoyes. normal usage works as expected
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·21 hours agoYes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.
They didn’t add any code to jqwik. It was just an instruction. A string.
Does that really make a difference?
yes. normal usage works as expected
Yes? If it had been in the readme it would have worked the exact same way. It’s not code, they aren’t pissing in anything. Literally no one but an AI would have a problem with it.