• LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Thankfully never got sucked into that void. I had a coworker who really evangelized functional programming. I wonder what he’s up to now.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      We have a principal engineer on our team that is pushing this sort of style, hard.

      It’s essentially obfuscation, no one else on the team can really review, nevermind understand and maintain what they write. It’s all just functional abstractions on top of abstractions, every little thing is a function, even property/field access is extracted out to a function instead of just… Using dot notation like a normal person.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        even property/field access is extracted out to a function

        Java, the most functional programming language there is.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well, this is in JS to be clear

          Instead of

          const name = user.name

          It’s

          const userToName(user) => user.name;

          const name = userToName(user);

          Ad nauseum.

          • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I was afraid you’d say that. That’s stupid.

            Do they give a reason for why that’s ‘necessary’?

            (Also it should be const userToName = (user) => user.name;)

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        That was the impression I got about functional programming, from what little I read about it like 15 years ago. Sounds like somebody found a pretty hammer and everything became a nail.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I dabbled in some Haskell a few years ago but quit trying when I got to the hard parts like monads and functors and stuff. All those mathematical concepts were a little too abstract for me.

      But what I did bring with me from the experience changed my way of programming forever. Especially function composition and tacit (point-free) style programming. It makes writing code so much faster and simpler and it’s easier to read and maintain.

      You can utilize some functional programming concepts without being too hardcore with it and get the best of both worlds in the process. 👍